Sins of Omission Can Speak Volumes

Mother Emmanuel African Methodist-Episcopal Church

On June 17, 2015 Dylann Roof walked into the Mother Emmanuel African Methodist-Episcopal church and sat down to join a Bible study group.

Dylann was welcomed by all, and invited to sit with them.  As everyone’s eyes were closed for the final prayer, Dylann took out his gun and killed nine people, shooting them at point-blank range.

One of the victims was the leader of the group, 59-year-old Myra Thompson, a retired public-school teacher and guidance counselor, who

Myra Thompson

just hours before had just been licensed to preach in that very church.

Mrs. Thompson’s husband, the Rev. Anthony Thompson has recently published a book entitled Called to Forgive: The Charleston Church Shooting, a Victim’s Husband, and the Path to Healing and Peace (Bethany House, 2019).

I heard about Rev. Thompson’s book while listening to a local Christian radio station. Rev. Thompson was telling his amazing story of what it had taken for him to forgive Dylann Roof for the crime of killing his wife.

More than that, Rev. Thompson mentioned his continuing attempts to befriend Roof and visit with him in prison, where he is serving a life sentence with no chance of parole.

I heard a powerful story about the healing power of Christ’s forgiveness and the personal resolve of a deeply compassionate, unusually obedient disciple of Jesus Christ.

It was a story that might normally bring tears to my eyes, were it not for the one thing that the interviewer and host of the program failed to mention – the very thing that I had suspected would go unremarked.

The interviewer and hosts failed to mention that Dylann Root is an avowed

White supremacist, Dylann Roof

white supremacist and neo-Nazi. His most chilling statement from prison was a declaration that he had no regrets.  He was not the least bit sorry, remorseful or apologetic for what he had done.

Neither did the radio hosts mention that Root had chosen the Mother Emmanuel African Methodist-Episcopal church because it is a black congregation.

Root deliberately chose a venue for his act of terrorism where he knew every bullet fired was guaranteed to penetrate the body of a black person.

Slaughtering African-American men, women and children was Root’s one and only goal.

None of the white people hosting the interview with Rev. Thompson bothered to connect the Charleston church shooting with the shocking rise in Right-Wing, conservative terrorism in this country.

No one bothered to point out that Root’s online manifesto, entitled The Last Rhodesian, was a white-supremacist screed calling for a race war against all people of color in America. Root confessed that he hoped his massacre would trigger that war.

No one mentioned that the Rev. Thompson’s Christ-like act of forgiveness is (or, at least, I assume it is) a very old, well-practiced act of Christian discipleship exercised within the African American church. A community that continues to confront the never-ending story of racism, discrimination, white violence, lynching and Jim Crow in this country.

I realize that my reader may object.

“Perhaps the radio producers wanted to keep politics out of it,’ you say. “They didn’t want Rev. Thompson’s story about the power of forgiveness to be overshadowed by a political message.”

My response, however, is baloney!

American Christian radio is one of THE most politically driven media outlets available today.

The problem is:  Christian radio is driven by conservative, right-wing, Republican politics. A brand a politics that refuses to admit its heinous contribution to the rise of white supremacy in this country.

So, the producers at the right-wing, Christian radio station offer their obeisance to the toadies of the Religious Right political movement and reframe the heartbreaking story of an explicitly racist, white-on-black mass-murder as a heart-warming, tear-jerker testimony to “the power of forgiveness.”

This sin of omission tells us everything we need to know about the Right, including the so-called Christian Right.

Framing is everything.

By trying to avoid politics, a story becomes disgustingly political  in the worst way possible.

The nine church shooting victims

For this particular framing of the Mother Emmanuel African Methodist-Episcopal church shooting is blatantly racist.

It’s silence shouts all too loudly, “We will not face the truth about who and what we are as white, American evangelicals.”

“We will support Donald Trump’s racist border policies.  But we will not tell the truth about our implicit racism towards our black brothers and sisters in Christ, about whom we know so little. And for whom we care even less – unless, of course, we can turn your experience of pain and suffering in white America into a warm and fuzzy feel-good story for our largely white, evangelical, pro-Trump listening audience.”

I too am a white, American evangelical, and I continually feel ashamed of my community.

When Fake Christians Wear Red Shirts at Presidential Rallies

Trump speaking at a Minneapolis campaign rally

President Trump spoke yesterday in Minneapolis to loud applause supplied by a large crowd of supporters, many wearing bright, red shirts emblazoned, “make American great again.”

If you didn’t see the speech, check out the excerpts and excellent response provided by The Young Turks here.  It’s well worth watching.

I also encourage you to read my book, I Pledge Allegiance: A Believer’s Guide to Kingdom Citizenship in 21st Century America, if you haven’t already.

In the course of his rambling diatribe (the longest he has yet given), the president mocked and ridiculed individual Democrats and members of the House.

He targeted more lies and slander against Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Somali refugee from Minnesota.  Rep. Omar and her family already receive around the clock security protection because of the regular death threats she receives, week in and week out, as she does her job for the people of Minnesota who elected her.

Omar also receives a surge in the number of threats against her life every time Trump mocks her in public, as he did again last night.

Trump then expanded his racist threats against the entire Somali refugee community in Minnesota, leading the crowd in cheers and applause as he bemoaned the horrible presence of hard-working, brown-skinned families finding refuge from their own war-torn country (partly facilitated by the U.S. military) in the bosom of white America.

The audience cheered again when the president promised that he will protect the good, white people of Minneapolis from the inconvenient threat of more dark-skinned refugees from Africa moving into their city.

How many of these red-shirted fans applauding Trump’s grotesque, racist drivel claim to be Christians?  How many say they are evangelicals?

Well, it’s long past time to draw the line, folks.

And here’s the line:

People who follow Jesus will NEVER cheer or applaud for such wretched, verbal trash.

People who follow Jesus will NEVER endorse the inhumane policies – like closing our doors to refugees and asylum seekers, separating families and kidnapping children at the border – that are produced by this man’s dark and evil heart.

As I now listen to Trump speaking at the “Voters Values Summit,” he is

Rep. Ilhan Omar

again falsely accusing Rep. Omar of saying things that she has never said. And he is being applauded by the audience!

We are witnessing the complete apostasy of American evangelicalism.  It’s happening before our eyes.

If you or your friends voted for Trump in 2016 and now regret that decision, hallelujah!  Confession your foolishness.  Ask for forgiveness for facilitating the rise to power of this latest anti-Christ now spewing his putrid filth onto the American stage.

Pray for wisdom to do better next time as a well-educated voter.

But if you or your friends plan to vote for Trump in 2020, if you too applaud at his rally speeches, then you must face the truth.

You have driven the Holy Spirit from your heart, if, indeed, you ever knew Him.

You, too, are a racist.

You have become an idolater.

Your conservative politics are more important to you than Jesus Christ.

You are cheering for a fascist, a blasphemer, a sexual predator, a racist, and a career criminal.

It is impossible to be an obedient follower of Jesus of Nazareth and persistently endorse such wickedness.

You may have known Jesus at one time, but no longer.

You have become one of the choked, blighted, dying seeds woefully described in Jesus’ parable of the Sower in Mark 4:1-20. You have lost whatever connect to the Savior you may once have had.

You have become like the pompous “miracle workers” condemned by Jesus at the close of his Sermon on the Mount. Despite their protests of devotion, he says to these people boasting of their “godly” accomplishments, “Get away from me, you evil doers, for I never knew you” (Matthew 7:23).

It is LONG past time for faithful pastors to speak up and to speak out against the evangelical apostasy occurring before our eyes.

Pastors, your people need Biblical teaching and education in the ethics of God’s kingdom. Hiding behind the pretense of avoiding partisanship in the pulpit is and has always been a cop out.

The church desperately needs your help.

Where are the true, faithful shepherds who will risk giving offense by teaching the FULL counsel of God and emphasizing the radical, upside-down lifestyle demanded by Jesus Christ?

Within evangelical congregations, they seem to be few and far between…

We Have an Empathy Deficiency

I tried listening to a conservative, call-in radio program last night.  Five to ten minutes was all I could take before my bleeding ears forced me to change the station.

The topic of conversation was the “invasion” of immigrants “flooding” across America’s southern border.

The first thing I noticed was the ignorance on display about the average person’s living circumstances in Central American countries where the U.S. has toppled governments in the recent past. The second and most prominent factor was the hard-hearted lack of empathy or compassion voiced by both the bloviating host and his lynch-mob minded callers.

It was painful to listen.

The ability to empathize – that is, feel an impulse for putting ourselves in another person’s place, to understand their pain, to try to feel what they are feeling as they are feeling it – is an important trait for every human being to possess.  Some would say it is part of what makes us human.

Unfortunately, not everyone can do it.  Many don’t ever try.

Both sociopaths and psychopaths can be identified by their inability, or well-practiced disinterest, in feeling empathy.  So, they can skin cats alive and watch other people suffer without experiencing a twinge of concern or human kindness.

I can only hope that a high percentage of psychopaths make evening calls to conservative radio talk shows .  Otherwise, America really is in deep trouble.

Perhaps you have heard the old saying about empathy:  Before you criticize another person first walk a mile in his shoes.  Then when you do criticize him you will be a mile away AND have his shoes.

At least, that seems to be the American, conservative understanding of empathy nowadays.

These children came home from school only to learn that their parents had been arrested by ICE. ICE agents say they are not responsible for the children

The painful lack of public empathy that I witnessed last night is also glaring evidence that many Americans who call themselves Christians do not know Jesus Christ from a hole in the ground, no matter what their “testimony.”

Empathy is THE cardinal Christian virtue.

The incarnation of Jesus Christ was/is the supreme demonstration of divine empathy.  The Father’s empathy for us, lost sinners, motivated him to send

His parents have vanished and ICE made no allowances for what to do with him or dozens of other minor children

his one and only eternal Son into this world. Empathy for humanity moved the Son to become fully human; to experience all that we experience; and to stick with it for an entire lifetime.  He walked in our shoes, carried our burdens, suffered injustice, died our death, and finally experienced resurrection as our Precursor.

To know Jesus is to know empathy.

To be like Jesus is to demonstrate empathy for others, but especially for those who are the most “unlike” us.  The Son of God was UTTERLY unlike sinful humanity in every way. Yet, He set aside all privilege in order to rescue undeserving, ungrateful, self-destructive people like you and me.

The kingdom of God is a kingdom founded on empathy for others unlike ourselves.

It is a kingdom founded upon practical action to meet others in their suffering and to alleviate their distress, to bring practical solutions to human dilemmas, to save life, to make more room for those seeking safety, to share whatever we have with those who have lost everything.

Without empathy there is no such thing as Christianity.

Without empathy there is no discipleship.

Without visible demonstrations of practical empathy there is no Christian Church.

Without empathy there is no hope for the human race or the planet.

Today Is Always a Good Day to Stand Up for God’s Kingdom

The mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio happened within 13 hours of each other.  Together they leave 29 people dead and between 50 to 60 people wounded.

Police on the scene in El Paso

The El Paso gunman left behind a manifesto proclaiming his allegiance to white supremacy, decrying the dangerous hordes of brown immigrants “flooding” across our southern border.  I haven’t heard any details yet about the shooter in Ohio, his motives or political ideology.

At least, law enforcement has begun to describe these horrific incidents for what they are:  domestic terrorism.

The FBI continues to warn that the vast majority of these incidents are committed by right-wing political extremists who are, without exception, white men.  In most cases, their targets are people of color.  Nowadays, anyone who looks like they might be Hispanic or Muslim is scrutinized without mercy.

Look at YouTube to watch the many videos posted there showing the white vigilantes who have deputized themselves to harass people of color.  They call the police because they overheard someone speaking a different language, or saw a black person walking through the neighborhood and “looking suspicious while being black.”

No informed citizen with an ounce of common sense can deny the overt,

Survivors of the El Paso shootings

blatant, explicit encouragement that such anti-immigrant, white, racist extremism is receiving from the White House.

If you don’t understand or believe that previous sentence then, I am sorry, but you are lost.

You need to be converted.

Your conscience has been swallowed up by the swamp of moral relativism and outright evil that has taken hold of this country’s public life, especially within the comfortable parlors of political conservatism, Republicanism and establishment D.C. power brokers.

And, yes, that moral degeneration includes the Democrats as well as anyone else who remains silent while the newest wave of neo-Nazis, skin-heads, neo-fascists and every other stripe of authoritarian race-baiter feels that this moment in our nation’s history is their opportunity to resurrect the Confederate flag and wave a banner of white, racial superiority over the graves of innocent men, women and children whose skin-tone carries too much melanin.

But I reserve my strongest condemnation for conservative evangelicals who continue to endorse this president’s policies and turn a blind eye to the daily dose of hatred spewing forth from his puerile and filthy mouth.

He is the latest anti-Christ who has risen up to deceive the church; like a  false prophet crying, “Peace, peace!” while he sows seeds of hatred, lies and racial division.

Everyone likes to imagine they would have been a hero in Hitler’s Germany.  We all tell ourselves, “I would have resisted.  I would have hidden Jews in MY attic.  I would never have allowed the Nazi flag in MY church.  The Fuehrer’s censors would have never have been allowed to edit MY sermons.”

We swear that we would have been a faithful Israelite, never to be counted among the idolaters that sent the nation into exile.

We would have been faithful disciples. Unlike Simon Peter, we would have spoken up in Jesus’ defense when the time came.

Well, folks now is the moment, another moment of truth.

Another opportunity for faithfulness to Christ is staring us in the face.  The question is – what will we, what can we, do?

I have a few suggestions:

  1. Every church, and every member of every church, located in a town, village, city or unincorporated township with a population of dark-skinned immigrants needs to walk door-to-door through those neighborhoods, shaking hands and offering hugs, help and resources while welcoming those people of color into your community. Listen to their stories. Ask if there is anything you and/or your church community can do to help meet their needs.  Then follow through, and do it. Make new friends. Have them over to your home; eat together and publicly testify to their humanity at every opportunity. Push for your church to become a more inter-racial community, if it isn’t already.
  2. Challenge all racist, white-nationalist types of conversation whenever, wherever you hear it – especially among Christians. Remind people that Jesus of Nazareth was a very brown-skinned, Palestinian Jew who had once been an immigrant himself seeking safety in a foreign land (Egypt). We worship a dark-skinned Savior.  Avoid fights, but faithfully and boldly represent the universal love of God for all people everywhere.
  3. Remind people that there is a difference between illegal immigration and seeking asylum. Asylum-seeking is perfectly legal. In fact, I believe that America owes automatic asylum – even citizenship – to anyone fleeing a dangerous situation in a country that has been destabilized by U.S. intervention, whether military, political or economic. THAT, my friends, includes the whole of Central and South America.  When the United States helps to destroy the social fabric of a nation by forcing it to adopt policies that serve American interests first, then we must take responsibility for the human fall-out. (Personally, I also believe that illegal immigration ought to be decriminalized.  We would still have border guards patrolling the southern border humanely, seeking to care for the people they detain and send back, but what is the point of jailing these people as felons after their second capture?  It serves no purpose but to enrich those who own America’s private, for-profit prison/detention system.)
  4. I haven’t touched on the many related issues such as the American gun lobby, gun ownership, etc. because I don’t want this post to become a book. We could also talk about the policy of separating children from their parents when detained at the border, and the fact that our government admits to having “lost track” of nearly 1,500 of these children.  Imagine if they were your children…
  5. Urge your pastor to talk about these issues in the context of obedient Christian discipleship. It is obvious and easy to “pray for the victims” of a mass shooting. Perhaps, it is the pastoral thing to do. But think about it: what good did it do for patriotic, German pastors to offer nice pastoral prayers for those who were being arrested and tortured by Hitler’s SS guards, while remaining silent about the immoral policies being implemented by those unjust arrests?  The church needs more than safe, pastoral prayers for victims. We need strong leadership and pointed Biblical teaching that identifies immorality and injustice in the public square; that gives direction to God’s counter-cultural ways of kingdom living in a nation wrestling with its own racist demons.

More Thoughts, and a Few Stories, on the Cultural Captivity of the Church

Years ago I came across a great book written by Douglas Hyde entitled Dedication and Leadership.  Hyde was a former Communist turned Roman Catholic who wondered why his Communist comrades had uniformly displayed deeper levels of commitment to world revolution than the typical Christian had for the gospel of Christ.

One of his suggestions for explaining this disparity focused on the church’s lack of anything resembling Bolshevik self-criticism. Recognizing that Communism required a complete reconstruction of the way people think about and interpret their world, the movement gathered members together into small groups for discussion and “self-criticism.”

Together these Communist study groups held each other accountable to purging old ways of thinking and behaving, while assembling, piece by piece, the renewed mind of a faithful, Communist ideologue.

Hyde laments that it is a rare church indeed that invests any deliberate effort into helping its members cultivate disciplines of healthy spiritual introspection, self-examination, and Christ-like self-criticism.  Yet, this is precisely what Paul expects every Christian to be doing as a part of their daily discipleship.  In Romans 12:2 the apostle says,

Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of our mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is…

Fallen, sinful minds like ours (you will understand, dear reader, that I assume you too are a guilty sinner like me) do not renew themselves automatically.  Yes, every Christian has the Holy Spirit to turn the impossible into the actual, but personal effort is the required fuel for all personal transformation.

Thus, far too many folks who call themselves Christians fail to think or to behave like people directed by the mind of God.

I was reminded of this personally a while back when talking with a friend about my time visiting my youngest daughter as she worked in the Kenyan slums surrounding Nairobi.  I was struck by the near universal happiness regularly on display in the lives of these people living in the most squalid poverty imaginable.

I couldn’t get over the beautiful smiles and the hearty laughter that I saw spontaneously erupting from the poor and destitute.

My friend listened to me and then quietly asked – with a beautiful smile on his face – David, why is it surprising that the poor would be happy?

That sentence hit me like a ton of bricks.  Good question, I said to myself.  Why indeed?

I suddenly realized, with the help of a friend exercising some good Christian/Bolshevik self-criticism, that I harbored an unrecognized prejudice.

I had spent my entire life in Christian ministry teaching people that money cannot buy happiness; that the love of money is the root of great evil; yet burrowed deep inside my brain remained this hidden assumption that people who lack money certainly can’t be truly happy and content.

Figuratively speaking (I hate it when people say “literally” when they mean “figuratively”), this moment of critical self-awareness blew my mind.

It also reminded me that cultivating the mind of Christ is a life-time process that demands daily self-criticism as well as good friends who are in the habit of similarly criticizing themselves.

Only such genuine disciples can make other disciples.

Getting together in small groups to socialize and hang out together is all well and good, but in and of itself, socialization it is a not an effective recipe for growing serious followers of Jesus.

I was thinking about this particular problem as I attended a Saturday morning men’s breakfast at a nearby church.

The speaker began by deriding what he believed were secular society’s efforts at emasculating, even feminizing, modern men. The church needed to help men to proudly reassert their masculinity.  Or so we were told.

(I found this a very strange thing to be saying in the age of the #MeToo movement.  But evangelicals have lived in a cultural ghetto for a long time.)

To facilitate the growth of masculine, godly men, the speaker announced that he was starting a new men’s Bible study for the church.  A handy video played on a big screen up front introduced the study’s content.

The 300 or so men present in the auditorium with me were all treated to a 5-minute action movie showing Navy SEALS fully armed, wading through water, jumping out of helicopters, and firing their weapons at (and undoubtedly killing) unseen enemies. A very masculine sounding narrator described how this new study (now available nation-wide) would teach us vital principles for godly manhood from the Navy SEALS handbook.

I groaned audibly and nearly regurgitated my breakfast.

I had spent my entire life thinking that Jesus of Nazareth was our perfect model for godliness.  Silly me!

Worse yet, I now discovered that my personal Bible study needed to be directed by a military training manual. Rats!

Those of you who know me will not be surprised to learn that it took all the self-control I could muster to remain seated.  Every fiber of my being wanted to stand up and loudly denounce the secular, unthinking, anti-Christian rubbish being shoveled out from the stage.

Sadly, I was witnessing another instance of American evangelicalism’s cultural captivity to the godless forces of social conformity. Political conservatism, militarism, patriotism, the myth of American exceptionalism, and gross nationalism had all conspired to trample the gospel of Jesus Christ into the ground, buried beneath the spit-polish black boots worn by “Christian soldiers” LITERALLY marching off to war.

And THAT is godly manhood?

We had been divided into groups of 10 sitting at circular tables. As the meeting drew to a close, we were encouraged to talk among ourselves about the morning’s lessons.

I believed that it would be irresponsible of me to say nothing. I had to speak my mind, fully convinced that I was speaking with the mind of Christ.

So, I grabbed the moment and told the other men at my table that this was a horrible example of un-Christian, anti-Biblical thinking infiltrating the church.  I will spare you all the details of my little speech condemning everything we had just been subjected to, but I will mention the response of a young man sitting opposite me at the table.

This young man in his 20s had accompanied his father to the breakfast.  As I spoke, his head began to nod heartily in agreement. As I finished, he said that he was glad I had spoken up. He told us all about how difficult it had been to grow up in Montana where everything in the surrounding society insisted that he become a tough guy, a macho-man, a fighter.

Not even the church provided any refuge from the cultural conditioning of a male dominated society where rugged individualism depended on a daily overdose of testosterone.

This young man, quite rightly, wanted to become more and more like Jesus, not a Navy SEAL.  He finds words of life in the holy Scriptures, not in a military training handbook.

He was fighting against his church’s cultural captivity, not surrender to it.

So, why was the “men’s pastor” employed by the church promoting a program developed by a nationally known evangelical media organization that will teach men to conform to American culture rather than stand against it?

Senate Shirks Responsibility and Primes the Pump for War with Iran

“Senate panel rejects requiring Congress sign off before Iran strike.” 

That is the headline at The Hill this afternoon.  Below is an excerpt:

“The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday rejected a Democratic proposal to require congressional approval before the U.S. can take military action against Iran.
“The panel voted 13-9 against a proposal blocking the administration from using funding to carry out a military strike in or against Iran without congressional signoff, according to Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the committee. 
“Murphy and Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) said earlier Wednesday that they were going to bring up their proposal for a vote in the committee as an amendment to a Syrian foreign policy bill.
“‘Congress is a co-equal branch that has the sole authority to declare war – so we don’t have to sit around and watch this administration spiral us into another endless conflict in the Middle East,’ Udall said in a statement.  

“Murphy added that Congress should ‘remind this administration that they do not have legal authorization to launch a war against Iran without our consent and that no one else is responsible but Trump for putting us on this blind campaign of escalation with no off-ramp.'”

Every Republican member of this Committee, with the exception of Rand Paul, voted against this important Democratic proposal.  Here are their names:

If any of these politicians represent you, or if you simply want to speak out as an American citizen, please contact their offices and reprimand them. Scold them, first, for abdicating their congressional responsibilities, and second, for making it that much easier for men without conscience like John Bolton and Mike Pompeo to begin another cruel, disastrous, unnecessary war in the Middle East.

We’ve Got “Clowns and Baboons in Washington” Threatening War

Those of you who have read this blog for sometime will know that I try to keep track of Lawrence Wilkerson, his interviews, lectures and writings, as

Retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

diligently as possible.

You may recall that Wilkerson is a retired Army colonel, former chief of staff to Colin Powell during the Bush Jr. administration.  He is now a regular contributor to The Real News Network.

He is a rare breed.  As far as I know, he is the only member of that administration to have promptly admitted to the wrongheadedness, stupidity, deception, illegality, and wholesale systemic, political failure that led up to the disastrous and immoral Iraq war.

The United States is now teetering on the brink of a major conflict, perhaps even an outright war, with Iran.  Those of you who have followed the recent history of US relations with Iran will not be surprised to hear Col. Wilkerson describe this administration’s current anti-Iran saber rattling as a repetition of the horrific boondoggle that led us into the Iraq war.

I won’t take the time to rehearse that sorry story-line here, rather I will simply quote a few of the more telling words from Col. Wilkerson in the hopes that you will be motivated to watch the entire 17 minute interview available here and here.

Below are a few gems from Wilkerson:

“I wouldn’t doubt for a moment that we [the US government] would manufacture another Gulf of Tonkin incident…” [Remember, the Gulf of

Vietnamese children fleeing their village; it had just been hit with napalm.

Tonkin incident was a fictitious “attack” on an American ship that became the official excuse for US military action in Vietnam.]

We are being governed “by clowns and baboons in Washington…”

“The world now sees the US as insane…warmongers…”

I believe that every follower of Jesus is called to be a pacifist. Consequently, the Christian’s public posture must always be in favor of peace, combating war and violence whenever, wherever it tries to raise its ugly head.

The necessity of public, anti-war protest is especially urgent when our “leaders” agitate for war on the basis of lies, misinformation and propaganda.

There is absolutely no reason whatsoever for the United States to see Iran as a hostile power, much less an enemy in need of a good bombing.

Know this: You and I are being lied to regularly by the MSM every time they discuss Iran.

I urge you to please do what I have done — call and/or write your elected officials and urge them to say NO to any and all efforts to attack Iran.

Only Congress has the Constitutional authority to declare war.  Tell your senators and representatives, at the very least, to insist on the enforcement of the War Powers Resolutions of 1973.

The Counterfactual Narrative of Growing Christian Persecution and Expanding Marxism in America

For some reason, religious conservatives in America insist on viewing themselves as a persecuted minority.

Gene Veith complains regularly about the persecution of American Christians at Patheos. His most recent post in this vein is entitled “Dehumanizing Christians.”

Though he thankfully, and quite necessarily, exhorts Christians never to dehumanize anyone, the focus of his piece centers nonetheless on a supposed increase in the dehumanization of traditional Christians in this era of expanding “neo-Marxist” politics.

Veith’s arguments depend largely on a related piece by Alfred Kentigern Siewers at The American Conservative entitled “What Christians Face in a Neo-Marxist World.”

There is MUCH to be explored here, but I will limit myself to only two brief  points:

First, my current bedtime reading consists of Professor Jason Stanley’s book How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (Random House, 2018). It’s a good book, not hard to read, and I highly recommend it.  Professor Stanley offers a boatload of historical material, both old and new, to illustrate his description of fascist politics and its affects throughout modern, western history.

Last night’s reading consisted of Stanley’s many examples of right-wing, fascist political parties expanding throughout Europe today.  An attentive reader can’t help but notice close similarities to the current atmosphere in American politics during this era of Trump’s presidency.

Stanley’s is not the first book I’ve read in the past few years discussing the history and characteristics of fascism — think of guys like Hitler, Mussolini and Franco.

I confess that I had a difficult time falling asleep as I contemplated, with a very downcast frame of mind, the many features of American public life that make this country overly ripe for our own slide into fascist territory.  In fact, some would say we have been there for some time.

So, here is a BULLETIN for Veith, Siewers, and similar conservative fear-mongers: the world is not threatened by the spread of neo-Marxism at this moment in history, neither are American Christians a primary target of extremist violence.

To begin with, there is no Marxist movement of any sort, whether neo, paleo, crypto, or psycho, in America today. Period.

In fact, the United States does not have a genuine leftist, left-wing, authentically liberal political party any more, despite the faux warnings of people like Laura Ingram, Shawn Hannity and Tucker Carlson.

Leftist strains of American politics died as viable political options long ago, with the demise of leaders like Frances Perkins (FDR’s Secretary of Labor), Dorothy Day, (Founder of the Catholic Workers Movement), Eugene Debs (5

Henry A. Wallace (1888 – 1965), one of my political heroes

times presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America), and Henry A. Wallace (vice-president for FDR).

However, we DO face the very real and very dangerous threat of fascism. But conservative pundits will rarely, if ever, recognize the dangers posed by this problem because of their own authoritarian  instincts. (One of the great failings of the American church, in my view, is its strong preference for authoritarianism and social control over freedom and liberty, but I digress.)

The fascist threat has already expanded throughout central and eastern Europe, and it could easily emerge vestigially in this country too, like the creepy, embryonic crab creature that latches onto your innocent face and then bursts your bowels in the Alien movie franchise.

Don’t be too skeptical. Large sectors of the American public have thrown their arms around fascism more than once in our history. Recall Sinclair Lewis’ famous (purported) statement, “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”

The right’s fraudulent neo-Marxist label is merely the favorite boogeyman

If you have never read Sinclair Lewis’ novel, _It Can’t Happen Here_, I encourage you to do so. He predicts what American fascism will look like.

conjured up by conservative pundits in order first, to scare their followers and second, to smear whomever they wish to attack at the moment.

Notice, for instance, how the neo-Marxist “threat” is also the favorite whipping boy for another current conservative phenom, Jordan Peterson. (Personally, I can’t understand his popularity, especially in the church.)

Second, as numerous studies have documented, the greatest rise in domestic terrorism and politically motivated violence in America has come from the right wing, not the left.

In 2009, the Republican-controlled congress suppressed and eventually pressured the Department of Homeland Security to repudiate its own report warning about the growing dangers of extreme right-wing violence in American. (see here, here and here).

You can read the full DHS report here; it’s entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.”

Well, folks. What they predicted in 2009 is coming true in 2019.

I clearly remember the times when candidate Trump encouraged and even praised public violence at his campaign rallies.

Trump applauded those who punched his critics and pledged to pay their legal expenses.  I watched the coverage at the time. He stoked his followers’ anger at the news media, calling out specific journalists covering his campaign, and “blessed” anyone who would teach them aside in order to teach them a thing or two.

In 2018, the Anti-Defamation League published a report entitled “Murder and Extremism in the United States” documenting the sharp rise in politically motivated, violent crimes in this country. The report’s executive summary begins with this sentence:

“2018 was a particularly active year for right-wing extremist murders: every single extremist killing — from Pittsburgh to Parkland — had a link to right-wing extremism.” (emphasis mine)

 I urge you to read the report for yourself. You will never hear about the dramatic increase of this problem from conservative pundits or cable news.

God’s people are called to deal in truth, which requires investigating the facts, all the facts. It means being honest; doing our best to critique our own biased tendencies; remembering that our primary allegiance is to God’s kingdom, not a political party, an ideology, or secular movement of any stripe.

We can never deal in fear-mongering or false accusations. The truth of the gospel is our standard of communication.

So, here are the simple facts:

First, neither Christians nor political conservatives are the primary, or the expanding, targets of politically or religiously motivated violence in America. To say otherwise is to perpetuate a myth.

The prize for being targeted by political violence goes to American Muslims, African-Americans, other people of color, and immigrants — including legal immigrants.

The bottom line is, white Christians need to stop their whining and abandon their self-pitying victim mentality. It is more than unbecoming. It is ungodly.

Second, you and I are about as likely to be harmed (whether physically, emotionally, psychically or rhetorically) by a rabid “neo-Marxist” as we are to be hit by an asteroid.  In fact, we are more likely to be struck by lightning.

If any of us (God forbid) is ever injured in an incident of domestic terrorism, the perpetrator, in all likelihood, will be a right-wing, ultra-conservative conspiracy theorist (who will probably imagine that he has been victimized by various and sundry neo-Marxist assailants.)

I firmly believe that Christian social and political engagement is important. But we need to understand what is actually going on in the world.  We dare no live in a dream world.

Such understanding requires stepping outside of the Christian media mis-information bubble, reading widely, studying broadly, and keeping our eyes focused on the kingdom of God.

Our only hope is in Jesus, and he never asks us to mislead others or to misrepresent the facts.

9/11 and the Pestilence of American Civil Religion

Religion is both unifying and divisive.  It’s the nature of the beast.

A set of shared beliefs and common acts of piety will consolidate a community of the faithful in shared devotion. But those religious practices will simultaneously exclude anyone who thinks, believes and behaves otherwise.

That’s why religious liberty and toleration have been crucial to the history of America’s experiment with democracy.  It is also why the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in his book The Social Contract, insisted that Christianity must be replaced by something he called Civil Religion– that is, the citizens’ devotion to the State.

We are currently witnessing a very public debate over the inclusion of 9/11 and the destruction of the Twin Towers into the religious iconography and liturgy of American civil religion.

Rep. Ilhan Omar recently gave a speech (a very good and important speech, in my view) condemning the persistent discrimination experienced by American Muslims in the aftermath of 9/11.  She focused on the rise of Islamophobia in this country, which has been the dark-side of the aftermath of 9/11 in this country.

Unfortunately, the keepers of America’s high-and-holy civil religion were

Rep. Ilhan Omar

indignant about Omar’s remarks because, in their view, she was not sufficiently reverential when referring to the tragedy.  And a tragedy it was; a horrific tragedy.  But there is a world of difference between the tragic and the sacred.

Omar’s point was that “some people did something,” as she put it, meaning a few Saudi Arabians flew airliners into the Twin Towers, and as a result, every Muslim in America has been put under a microscope and viewed with suspicion as a potential “terrorist” ever since.

Speaking from the place of the underdog, a Muslim woman of color in post-9/11 America, Rep. Omar was condemning the overflow of injustice that has been meted out upon her community by those holding the reins of power in the American establishment.

The high priests of American civil religion are not happy.

Omar was immediately condemned for not genuflecting in the direction of the fallen Towers. She failed to cloth herself in dust and ashes.  She didn’t speak solemnly enough or kneel deeply enough while weeping a stream of tears. In short, she wanted to present a different perspective, speaking, not for the dead but for the living, for the many who continue to suffer needlessly because of the 9/11 tragedy.

As a result, Omar has been branded a heretic.  She has violated the central tenet of all civil religion – worship of the innocent nation as holy.  But Omar didn’t embrace America’s mythology about striding the globe as a paragon of innocence, attacked without cause or justification by the dark-skinned denizens of evil on 9/11.

Nor do I. And neither should you.

Now she is paying the price that every truth-teller pays when speaking Truth to Power.

At least one man has recently been arrested for threatening to kill Rep. Omar.

The president joined in with the uncivil chorus of civil religion choir boys by tweeting a short film linking Omar to the 9/11 attacks, implicitly accusing her of sacrilege. Rep. Omar’s congressional office is now receiving more death threats against the congresswoman than ever before. Her security detail has been increased.

Even Nancy Pelosi, the House majority leader, gave Rep. Omar a back-handed slap when she issued a statement condemning Trump’s tweet. She scolded,

The memory of 9/11 is sacred ground, and any discussion of it must be done with reverence. The President shouldn’t use the painful images of 9/11 for a political attack.

Spoken like a career politician and high priestess in the temple of America.  The standard of sacred discourse about America’s tragedy has been established for all to see.  It must be done with reverence as we approach holy ground…but excuse me while I toss my cookies.

We can read between Pelosi’s lines. Yes, the president is a hate-mongering sociopath who doesn’t think twice about fomenting more violence against an innocent woman whose family is already under 24-hour police protection.

But notice how Pelosi also smoothly sticks a shiv into Omar’s back.

Only an experienced priestess of power could issue a statement explicitly condemning the president’s grotesque bloviating, while implicitly condemning her party colleague for failing to offer up proper homage to American sanctity.

Of course, the fundamental problem with all of this is that civil religion is an abomination.  It is idolatry, plain and simple.  And we are currently witnessing another example of its destructive power.

God’s people cannot have anything to do with this kind of foolishness.

We certainly have no business cheering on either the cruelty and maliciousness demonstrated by the president, or the self-righteousness displayed by today’s Pharisees and high priests of American civil piety. Both the Left and the Right are equally guilty.

A pox on both their houses.

There is nothing holy or sacred about the ruins of the Twin Towers or the memory of 9/11.  God does not live there. He never did. It is certainly a place for people to grieve the massive loss of life and the thousands of loved ones murdered that day, but neither tragedy nor sorrow turns a renovated ruin into sacred space.

That sanctification occurs only in the presence of The Holy One, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

But the Ancient of Days has not built his temple in America.  Neither does civil religion give God glory.

But then, instigating violence and vitriol against a principled woman who speaks her conscience looks very much like the rotten fruit one would expect to issue from civil religion’s demonic tree.

Personally, I won’t speak of 9/11 in hushed tones, but I will stand with Rep. Omar.

I Evaluate Eric Erickson’s Evaluation of Pete Buttigieg’s Evaluation of President Trump (who thinks he is above evaluation)

Eric Erickson has an interesting article at The Resurgent discussing Pete

Eric Erickson

Buttigieg’s interview last Sunday on Meet the Press. It’s entitled, “Pete Buttigieg Shows Why Progressive Christianity is a Hypocritical Farce.”

You can read the entire piece, which contains a video clip of the T.V. interview under discussion, by clicking on the title above. Or you can read a brief excerpt provided below.

I am writing this post for several reasons:

First, I found Erickson’s article interesting.  I agree with his argument about Buttigieg’s moral relativism with respect to Buttigieg’s decision to lead a gay lifestyle, including his marriage to another man.

Erickson is right to point out that Buttigieg can’t call out President Trump’s hypocrisy for ignoring Biblical commands to “help the widows and the orphans” while simultaneously ignoring the New Testament’s condemnations of same-sex intimacy.

Nope, that doesn’t wash, Mr. Buttigieg.

Pete Buttigieg

Buttigieg’s judgments on this score not only look like cherry-picking from among the select pieces of scripture he happens to like (or dislike), it IS cherry-picking of the most obvious sort.

Secondly, however, Erickson commits a few blunders of his own that make me hesitant to call him an ally in my concerns about filtering our political thinking through the presence of God’s kingdom on earth. (Again, check out my book, I Pledge Allegiance: A Believer’s Guide to Kingdom Citizenship in 21st Century America).

My concerns begin with the title of this article — “Pete Buttigieg Shows Why Progressive Christianity is a Hypocritical Farce.”

The title raises a number of troubling questions which Mr. Erickson never tries to answers.

How does he define Progressive Christianity?  What is it exactly? A writer really shouldn’t be attacking something that he makes no effort to describe.

And why should I accept Mr. Erickson’s assumption that Pete Buttigieg is a (if not the) representative of said Progressive Christianity? Has Mr. Buttigieg ever made that claim for himself? Has an official spokesperson for “Progressive Christianity” ever claimed Pete Buttigieg as its chosen candidate?

Nope and nope. So, I have to ask, on what basis is Erickson implying that connection now? In fact, what the heck is he trying to say by making such a suggestion???

Nope, Mr. Erickson. This is an underlying assumption of yours that I’m not willing to share. Such ill-conceived innuendo does not constitute an argument.

Furthermore, demonstrating one respect in which Buttigieg is being hypocritical (an extremely human trait by the way, displayed by all of us at one time or another) is a far cry from proving that the entirety of Progressive Christianity (however that is defined) is either hypocritical or farcical.

You are grossly over-reaching Mr. Erickson, which always makes me suspicious that there is something other than a concern for proper Biblical interpretation and its consistent application animating your arguments.

I think I smell a purely political agenda brewing in the background; partisanship disguised in the popular garb of Christian conscience.

Actually, in a round-about fashion, Erickson ends up showing us that his view of Christianity is every bit as skewed by partisan loyalties as is Buttigieg’s.

In his article chiding Buttigieg for publicly denying the possibility that  president Trump might be a Christian, Erickson begins by pointing out how “badly” Buttigieg himself performs while “trying to play a Christian on television.

The implication is clear: Erickson can’t believe that Buttigieg is a genuine Christian, either.

Ouch.  I can’t help but wonder if Erickson is “trying to play a Christian” at The Resurgent?

In one way, I agree with Buttigieg.  I do not find Trump’s profession of Christian faith the least bit believable, either. The man is a career criminal who admits that he has never felt the need either to confess his sins or to ask God for forgiveness. Trump’s past, as well as his present, suggest that our president is a sociopath.

And that, sadly, assures us that our current president is (for now, at least) a son of perdition.

On the other hand, I don’t know know much about either Mr. Erickson or Mr. Buttigieg, and I can’t judge either man’s faith in Jesus. (Perhaps I will write another post in the near future about how a Christian may or may not pursue a gay lifestyle.) However, I’ll happily remind them both that being a Christian means submitting the entirety of our lives, in every respect, to the teaching and the Lordship of the resurrected Jesus.

That Jesus was not a progressive or a conservative or a democrat or a republican.  Christ’s only partisanship is to the eternal glory of his heavenly Father. Thus, he remains the eternal Son who requires that his followers seek after God’s kingdom, first, last, and always.

Here, finally, is that excerpt I promised:

“Buttigieg said he thought evangelicals backing President Trump were hypocritical because when he goes to church he hears about taking care of widows, the poor, and refugees, but Trump does not do that. Buttigieg went on to draw a distinction. In his professional conduct, Trump does not take care of widows and refugees as scripture commands and Buttigieg is right on this. Then Buttigieg continues that in Trump’s personal life as well he falls short of Christian behavior (he is right on that part too, by the way, but then we are all sinners). You can see the full, unedited exchange here.

“Interestingly, Buttigieg goes on to note that evangelicals are too focused on sexual ethics these days. He seems to be arguing that they need to drop that aspect of their faith, as he has. Then comes the pivot exposing Buttigieg’s own hypocrisy.

“Buttigieg thinks the President is not really behaving as one who believes in God because, as President, Donald Trump is not taking care of the widows, the orphans, the poor, and the refugees. Chuck Todd asks Buttigieg about his position on abortion and Buttigieg’s response is that abortion is a moral issue and we cannot legislate morality.

“This is why progressive Christianity is so corrupt and flawed. As much as Buttigieg makes a valid critique on the President’s behavior and evangelicals excusing that behavior, Buttigieg wants to reject the inconvenient parts of faith he does not like. He is a gay man who got married; he does not think homosexuality is a sin despite express statements in scripture, and he thinks abortion is a moral issue and we cannot legislate our morality. Buttigieg wants to use the social obligations as Christians against the President, but wants to avoid any implication on the personal obligations of Christians in terms of clear Biblical sexual ethics and how we are to live our lives applying our faith even for ‘the least of these.’

“He wants to have it both ways and in reality is showing he is no better a Christian than Donald Trump. What is particularly damning here is that Buttigieg claims to be governed by some moral code and he claims he will lead as a more moral President than Trump. At the same time, he claims we cannot do exactly what he is proposing.

“Everyone has a moral code and we all conduct our actions by our moral code. Buttigieg just wants a pass on his moral code, which is all about not taking inconvenient stands on parts of scripture that might make his life a bit uncomfortable. He will wield it against the President and abdicate when it comes to himself.”