Prof. Avi Shlaim: Zionism is Racism

Avi Shlaim began  his academic career as an Israeli graduate student who went to England for his doctoral work.

He is now a long-time Oxford professor who has done pioneering historical research on the origins of the modern state of Israel and the history of Zionism.

He is one of those rare people of moral character who is willing to be self-critical. He is more committed to a consistent ethic applied equally to all than he is to nationalism or ideology.

Here is a brief excerpt from a longer interview with Human Rights Watch.

Former Soldier Denounces Israel’s Occupation of the West Bank

Breaking the Silence is an organization of former Israeli soldiers who are trying to educate their fellow citizens about the brutality of Israel’s military occupation over the Palestinian people in the West Bank.

Watch as this woman tells her story (with English translation). She explains how the Occupation is both persecuting Palestinians and poisoning Israel.

Riley Gaines Testifies Before Congressional Committee

If you are not aware of who Riley Gaines is, she is a champion, collegiate swimmer who was required to compete against a “male-to-female” transgender swimmer in college.

Listen as she tells part of her story to Congress, describing the numerous offenses she and her fellow, female competitors had to endure as a result of this.

She anything but a fanatical crusader. But she is a sane, rational, thoughtful female athlete who is pointing out, and confronting, the very real problems posed when women are forced to compete against biological men who claim to be transgender women.

The Update to My Pride Month Post Has Been Added

For those of you who are interested in following up on my last post discussing the Christian church’s relationship to Pride Month, I promised you that I would add a link to my pastor’s Sunday morning message covering this topic.

You can find that link here. I hope you enjoy it and find yourself challenged and encouraged.

Some Thoughts on the Christian Church and Gay Pride Month

Gay pride month, with its rumblings over pronouns, sexual identity, and LGBTQIA issues, has stirred me to share a few of thoughts about the subtleties involved in these gender conversations which are generally overlooked by many of those who argue over them.

Christians are no exception to this generalization. In fact, we are often the worst at neglecting the relevant nuances when we ought to be the most sensitive to them. For these subtleties are uniquely Christian contributions to the public discussion about gay marriage and sexual-gender identities. If we don’t offer them up, it’s unlikely that anyone else will.

Shame on us for not being more biblically and theologically astute.

[By the way, my pastor recently gave an excellent message on these issues. Here is the link if you want to listen. The entire message is well worth your time, but his discussion of Pride Month begins at the 20:10 mark.]

First, Christians must remember that sexual identity does not entail (much less require) sexual activity.

The secular world jettisoned this fact long ago. Society assumes that whatever you “are” – gay, straight, bi, trans, what-have-you – you will be engaging in that particular “mode” of sexual activity. To be a sexual person means to be sexually active. It is both natural and inevitable.

Tragically, the Christian church has fallen into the trap of sharing this assumption, not only concerning those outside of the church but for those within it, as well.

We assume that a sexual-gender identity will always entail sexual activity. This is why straight men can become particularly cruel and heartless when discussing gay men. They imagine the sex acts involved and are often repulsed. That sense of revulsion is then sanctioned by the demeaning attitudes too often shared by fellow Christians. Thus, base cruelty, born of presumption and self-righteousness, becomes acceptable among the “godly.” This ought not to be.

The fact that the New Testament does, in fact, prohibit gay sexual activity is beside the point for now. As a Christian I understand that scripture only approves of sexual activity within the confines of marriage – that is, a life-long commitment between one man and one woman. All other sexual practices, whatever they may be, with whomever they may happen, fall under the condemnation of that old fashioned word fornication.

Fornication is an equal opportunity sin. It does not discriminate between straight, gay, bi, or what have you.

Anyone engaging in sexual activity with anyone other than his/her heterosexual spouse is guilty of sin. The intimate, mechanical details of this activity are irrelevant. No one needs to imagine anything. The only relevant question is this: is it marital sex (biblically defined) or fornication? It’s really that simple.

We also see this confusion arise when conservative Christians insist that “gay people cannot hold positions of church leadership.”

This simply is not true.

Nowhere does scripture condemn people for being born with gay or lesbian inclinations. Same-sex attraction is no more sinful than heterosexual attraction. The restrictive question is not one of attraction or inclination but of activity (real or imagined) with a particular partner.

Of course, gay people can serve as church leaders, provided that they remain celibate. Just as straight people can serve in church leadership, provided they remain celibate if single and faithfully monogamous if married.

The Christian church has an ancient, venerable tradition of life-long celibacy among its leaders, notwithstanding the horrific legacy of sexual abuse now on display within the Roman Catholic and many Protestant churches. Sin needs to be corrected, not awarded the power to scuttle right practices. Vows of celibacy are as old and as respectable as the apostle Paul.

Christians who automatically reject the idea of accepting gay Christians into leadership roles reveal that they too are making false assumptions. Remember, sexual natures do not require sexual activity. Celibacy is possible, especially when that leader is surrounded by an understanding, compassionate community of faith.

The second neglected subtlety concerns the place of sin, specifically our understanding of the Fall described in Genesis 3, within the workings of creation.

Only last night I listened to an interview with one of the leaders of America’s largest Protestant denomination. He was discussing the current controversies surrounding the “treatment” of childhood transgenderism. With great authority he declared that God had created only two genders/sexes: male and female. Thus, according to him, there could be no such thing as a genuinely transgendered human being.

You’ve probably heard this kind of thing before.

Unfortunately, this Christian leader (and all those like him) are wrong on both their theology and biology.

For starters, the creation story is followed by a sequel – the horrific story of the Fall in Genesis 3. Satan successfully tempts the first man and woman to disobey their Creator, thereby throwing a monkey wrench into God’s original design. Original sin is all pervasive, creating brokenness, rifts, splinters, and unintended consequences all throughout God’s creation. Things are no longer the way they were supposed to be.

Every Christian ought to understand this.

Furthermore, as a result of the Fall, even though God may have originally created only male and female, the monkey wrench of sin has complicated the gender mix considerably.

Now precious human beings who bear the Image of God can also be born as “intersex” individuals, possessing some combination of both male and female sexual organs. In fact, some medical professionals estimate that intersex births may be as high as 2% of annual birth rates. [I recommend watching the touching documentary Some Body to begin your introduction to this issue.]

Gender dysphoria – where a person is convinced that their true gender is inhabiting the wrong sort of body – is a genuine psychological condition, I believe. The monkey wrench of sin has damaged human psychology and genetics as well the human will and imagination.

Though I suspect that gender dysphoria is much rarer than many activists would have us believe, the Christian church must be a place where people struggling with this type of gender confusion can find God’s grace and compassion extended to them through a flesh and blood community.

To insist that God only created male and female is wrongheaded because it tells only half the story.

The second half of God’s story reminds us that nothing today is that neat and clean. For Satan then stepped into God’s creation to make a mess of things. And, with our help, he succeeded royally. Today’s church is called to deal graciously with that mess, the mess we call real life, where very few things, including sexual identities, are as neat and clean as we might like.

To retreat behind bad theology or poor Bible reading; to neglect important subtleties due to thoughtlessness; to make unwarranted or false assumptions about others; to compromise with the secular norms around us; or to forget that Jesus loves broken, hurting people – including you and me – is to fail in our responsibilities as God’s people.

The beauty of the gospel is that God’s grace through Jesus Christ is extended to everyone without discrimination, whether gay, straight, LGBTQIA, or something else altogether.

If you are a sinner like me, then Jesus loves you.

The church needs to become more informed, less reactionary, more biblical, less susceptible to following in the steps of society, and more exemplary of God’s Amazing Grace extended to all.

Returning to Aida Camp and Planting Trees in Masafer Yatta

[It’s been a while since my last post! I will tell you about some of the things I’ve been doing in a few of the upcoming posts. Here are a few stories about our recent trip to Israel-Palestine. It also gives me a chance to plug my latest book, Like Birds in a Cage, which describes life in Aida camp more extensively.]

It had been nearly 5 years since we last visited our friends and loved one’s in Aida refugee camp near Bethlehem. So, we planned a return visit in early May and spent the rest of the month in our home away from home. We returned to the USA on May 31st. (Whereupon I was struck down by a long-menacing sinus infection. Ugh. But I am much better now, thank you.)

We had returned to the embrace of our Aida Camp family for no more than 10 days when 3 teenage boys were shot by Israeli soldiers, which is the standard punishment for throwing rocks towards heavily outfitted, helmet-wearing soldiers in body armor. Five years’ absence had not changed anything about daily life in Aida camp.

Actually, one of the boys was not shot by a living, breathing soldier but by a Terminator-style, automated, robotic, high-powered rifle. Only the night before a deadly device had been installed on top of the Apartheid Wall segregating Aida from the encroaching Jewish-only neighborhoods of SE Jerusalem. This new, robotic, high-powered rifle now rules over the main entrance to the camp; its field of fire covers the main Aida thoroughfare, several community centers, 2 playgrounds, 1 soccer field, a cemetery, and scores of apartments.

No one knows when or why the new installation may fire again. But this is nothing new. Palestinians have always served as unwilling guinea pigs for Israel’s cutting-edge military gadgets, whether it’s new teargas formulas, other “non-lethal” munitions, or facial recognition technology at checkpoints. No one has yet to inform Aida’s community leaders about the military’s rules of engagement for the new Terminator gun. But this is to be expected. Did Custer ever explain his military tactics to Sitting Bull?

Going to Massafer Yatta

On the first Friday of the month, we traveled with about 100 members of the Aida Youth Center to help an aged farmer work his land in a highly contested area south of Hebron known as Masafer Yatta.

Last year this Palestinian farmer was attacked by Jewish settlers from a nearby Jews-only settlement encroaching on this man’s agricultural land. The settlers broke both of the farmer’s hands. He was then jailed for 10 days without medical attention. [Nope, none of the settlers were arrested. “Law enforcement” in the West Bank exists to serve the purposes of Zionist settlement not to safeguard the Palestinians being displaced.]

My friend, Munther, had been in contact with this farmer and made arrangements for the young people of Aida Camp to replant his fields and rebuild one of the boundary markers along the border of a dirt roadway.

As the Palestinian teenagers picked up their farming tools, the disabled farmer welcomed everyone to his village. With his black and white kufiya blowing in the wind, he gave us instructions about where to plant the hundreds of starter plants we had brought along with us: grape vines, olive trees, as well as peach and apricot seedlings.

After a hard day’s work, planting and watering hundreds of new seedlings, we moved across a large stretch of rocky ground in order to rebuild the small rock wall demarcating the side of a narrow dirt road, running parallel to the edge of the field.

Now for Some Politics

It did not take long for Jewish settlers to emerge from the nearby Jewish-only settlement. They immediately set about destroying our wall, taking down the rocks we had put into place. They were soon followed by Israeli soldiers determined to chase us out of the area.

You see, Masafer Yatta has been declared an Israeli “military firing zone” which means that civilian occupation and agricultural development are prohibited. Palestinian villages have all received demolition orders, their long-time residents told to evacuate the area. Expulsions and demolitions have been ongoing for a long time.

Israeli authorities insist that the Palestinian residents, most of whom have lived on this land for many generations, often going back to the time of the Ottoman Empire, do not have the proper building permits necessary for them to stay where they are.

It’s a perfect Catch-22. Israel refuses to issue the very permits it requires of Palestinian residents, while also refusing to recognize the Ottoman-era title deeds the people still possess. The Mad Hatter couldn’t have devised a more insanely oppressive system.

The height of Israeli hypocrisy appears in the growth of Zionist, Jewish-only settlements in the very areas from which Palestinians are now being expelled. Declaring regions like Masafer Yatta a “closed military firing zone” is an old tactic used by the Zionist state.

It provides a cover story for the expulsion of the indigenous people who have lived here for generations, while simultaneously making room for more and more Jewish settlers who are apparently immune to the dangers of military firing zones. (Because no firing takes place.)

So a Palestinian farmer is beaten, his hands broken, and his land pillaged, while white settlers descended from recent European immigrants take over the region, building their shiny colonial startup cities with the help of Israeli state funding.

Eventually, we were all forced to leave the area as the Israeli soldiers fired tear gas and a stun grenade into the group of panicking teenagers. Munther, the group’s leader, is committed to nonviolent resistance. He was hectically moving from one spot to another, grabbing stones out of boys’ hands, trying to prevent anyone from throwing rocks at the soldiers.

The young people quickly loaded onto the bus that would take them back to Aida camp. Terry and I rode with Munther who was happy to avoid arrest and Israeli detention.

I wondered how long our plantings would survive. Are any of them still growing? Or have they all been ripped out of the ground by settlers?