Blog

Keeping Christianity Difficult with Sǿren Kierkegaard

I plan on periodically sharing excerpts from the writings of Sǿren Kierkegaard, one of my favorite Christian authors.  Whether or not you agree with him, he is always worth reading (very slowly) and pondering (usually, for a long time).

Here is our Kierkegaard reading for today:

“Hardship is the road [for the Christian life].  Far be from us this hypocritical talk that life is so varied that some are walking along the same road without hardships, others in hardships…Doubt about the task [of discipleship] always has its stronghold in the idea that there could be other roads…but since hardship is the road, the hardship cannot be removed without removing the road, and there cannot be other roads, but only wrong roads.”

In other words, living for Jesus by definition brings difficulty and suffering.  If following Jesus has never made my life more complicated, more difficult, then I am probably not really following Jesus.  I am simply taking a walk.

The Danish Christian thinker, Sǿren Kierkegaard (1813-1855), has been an important spiritual friend of mine for many years.  His writings have provided me with comfort, encouragement, challenge and insight, always mixed with spiritual and intellectual stimulation.

I have even written a book – Encountering Jesus, Encountering Scripture – explaining how Kierkegaard’s “way of knowing” through personal experience is, in fact, the New Testament’s own account of acquiring faith through spiritual experience.

Engaging Kierkegaard has helped me to persevere in following my Lord. Though, as the famous Dane repeatedly confessed, I continue in the process of following Jesus, dependent entirely on his grace.  I still have a long way to go in being conformed to the image of our Savior.

Kierkegaard often went so far as to say that he was in the process of becoming a Christian.  He had not yet arrived.  And, no. He did NOT say this because he believed in earning his way into God’s kingdom by relying on works righteousness.

Kierkegaard talked this way because 19th century Denmark was a nation in the throes of “Christendom.”  That is, the vast majority of its citizens attended the Lutheran state church, and almost everyone considered themselves to be Christian simply because they were Danish.  Denmark was, after all, a “Christian nation.”

Sound familiar?

Following his conversion out of Christendom and into genuine repentance and trust in Jesus Christ, Kierkegaard became a resident missionary to his own people.  He well understood that the Jesus we encounter in the New Testament is highly offensive to anyone who takes him seriously.  After all, Jesus makes the most outrageous demands of his followers.

When the gospel of Jesus Christ is explained truthfully, it is highly offensive and inconvenient.  Jesus repells as well he as attracts.  He offers the average listener many more reasons to say, No, than to say, Yes.

So, as a missionary to Christian Denmark, Kierkegaard became convinced that he must make Christianity difficult.  For only by hearing the highly offensive challenge embedded in the Lordship of Jesus Christ does anyone hear the truth of the gospel.

Making Christianity “difficult,” then, was simply a matter of talking about Jesus faithfully. Something that was in short supply in 19th century Denmark, especially among pastors and theologians working for the state church.

But, if we stop to think about it, Kierkegaard’s Denmark was not all that different from America today.

Even though the United States has never embraced an established, state church, far too many Americans are blinded by a similar idolatry – belief in a Christian nation where patriotism eclipses allegiance to the resurrected Jesus.

Yes. Our country desperately needs to hear a much more difficult brand of Christianity.

American Empire Never Quits

Corporate efforts at killing Brazilian democracy, backed by the U.S. government and American oil companies, continues unabated.

For now, let’s skip over the first U.S. backed military coup in 1964 and jump into the present-day.

Rousseff

More recently, the corporate-controlled right wing senate illegally impeached President Dilma Rousseff without any evidence of wrong-doing.  Her defenders have called it a “political coup,” fueled by a pact between the government, military leaders and the oil companies.  She was not as friendly to big business as the conservatives in  her government would have liked.  And, of course, they are all very chummy with the U.S.

Temer

The current president, Michel Temer who was a leader in the group that ousted Rousseff, is now the most unpopular leader in Brazilian history, crippled by his own well-publicized corruption scandals.

Enter Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (known simply as Lula among the people), a former president seeking another term in that office now that his protege, Rousseff, has been ousted.  He is extraordinarily popular, and seemed to be headed towards an easy upset at the polls.

Lula

But corporate powers have intervened yet again. Lula has just been “convicted” on corruption charges and sentenced to prison, despite the fact that no one has ever been able to offer any evidence of his guilt. (Read this amazing story at The Intercept).

The Supreme Court that just convicted Lula has more suspicious financial connections to the corporate oligarchs that funded Rousseff’s impeachment than you can shake a stick at.

If you don’t believe that the U.S. government and the American oil industry is not helping to finance all of this turmoil, well then, I have some swamp land I’d like to sell to you in Florida.

  • Update:  check out this informative analysis by Mark Weisbrot, of the Center for Economic and Policy Research,  from Democracy Now.

Where is the Palestinian Gandhi? Dead or in Prison.

Thomas Friedman, among others, once suggested that the long-awaited solution to Israel’s military occupation of the Palestinian people could be found in a Gandhi-esque mass movement of Palestinian non-violent resistance.

In a 2002 New York Times editorial entitled “Waiting for Gandhi on the West Bank,” penned during the First Intifada, Friedman opined:

“…the Palestinians have long had a tactical alternative to suicide: non-violent resistance à la Gandhi. A non-violent Palestinian movement appealing to the conscience of the Israeli silent majority would have delivered a Palestinian state 30 years ago”

In July 2010, the New York Times editorialist Nicholas Kristof offered similar advice:

“…imagine if Palestinians stopped the rock-throwing and put female pacifists in the lead.  What if 1,000 women sat down peacefully on a road to block access to an illegal Jewish settlement built on Palestinian farmland? What if the women allowed themselves to be tear-gassed, beaten and arrested without a single rock being thrown? Those images would be on televisions around the world – particularly if hundreds more women marched in to replace those hauled away.”

I can’t help but notice how easy it is for Kristof to volunteer someone else’s grandmother – in the case of Palestine, thousands of mothers and grandmothers – for a good gassing, beating, arrest and sentencing to a brutal, Israeli military prison.

I find it especially curious that, since both Friedman and Kristof clearly imply that the Palestinians deserve a peaceable resolution to The Occupation, neither of them has the guts to criticize (much less condemn) Israel’s draconian policies towards Palestinians in the Occupied Territories.

A Palestinian stands on his property overlooking the Israeli settlement Har Homa, West Bank, February 18, 2011. U.S. President Barack Obama called Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas…in an attempt to prevent the upcoming vote on an United Nations resolution condemning Israeli settlements. UPI/Debbie Hill

Kristof even acknowledges, whether accidentally or not, that Jewish settlements in the West Bank are illegal under international law.  Yet, he does not propose the obvious solution of dismantling these illegal settlements which steal Palestinian resources on a daily basis.

Mr. Kristof thinks it better to imagine thousands of pacifist, Palestinian grandmothers battered by tear-gas canisters and hauled off to a military prison.  My apologies, I cannot help but wonder if Mr. Kristof’s Freudian slip is showing?  Was he secretly grinning when he wrote that sentence?

Furthermore, both writers seem to agree that continued rock-throwing – yes, that most horrid of all destructive terrorist tactics, rock-throwing…by women and children, no less! – poses an insuperable obstacle to Israel’s acceptance of Palestinian demands for peace in their own territory.

Imagine what peace might be had in the Promised Land already if only those Palestinian protesters had shown the bravery needed to surrender their rocks!  One can only wonder.

However, if the current blood-letting in Gaza teaches us anything, it is that the majority of Israeli citizens today have no conscience.  At least, not when it concerns the Palestinians.  There is no moral “silent majority” waiting to “deliver a Palestinian state” if only rabid Palestinian miscreants would get their non-violent house in order.

As the journalist Gideon Levy writes in today’s edition of Haaretz (4/5/18):

“In Gaza, Israeli army snipers shot unarmed demonstrators as if they were on a shooting range, to a chorus of rejoicing by the media and the masses…This is what the nation wants and this is what it will get. Even if soldiers kill hundreds of demonstrators in Gaza, Israel will not bat an eyelid. The reason: evil and hatred of Arabs. Gaza is never perceived as it really is, a place inhabited by people, an enormous and terrible prison, a huge site of human experimentation. Most Israelis, who — just like their prime minister — have never spoken to a single Gazan, only know that the Gaza Strip is a nest of terrorists. That’s why it’s OK to shoot them. Shocking? Yes, but true.”

Will the likes of Friedman and Kristof now recant?

Will they and their pro-Zionist brethren finally admit that, as long as Israel retains the unquestioning support of the world’s only super-power, no Palestinian strategy for gaining their human rights, liberty and civic freedoms will every prove effective? No sort of resistance will ever be tolerated?

Will they recognize that political Zionism finally has drowned the last vestiges of Israeli conscience and humanitarian spirit in the brackish waters of Jewish nationalism, synonymous with systematic, unapologetic racism?

The entire world is now witnessing what happens when massive, non-violent protests confront the military force of an ethnocracy, rooted in a commitment to purity-of-blood, defending its founding ideology of racial privilege.

Historical discussions on the effectiveness of non-violent movements, of course, usually focus on Gandhi’s confrontation of British rule in India. Gandhi has become the icon of pacifistic civil disobedience, especially as he led the people’s Salt March in 1930.

Cynics, however, have typically responded to pro-Gandhi idealists by pointing out the humanitarian bent of the British Empire (grossly exaggerated, by the way).  They then pose an alternative scenario:

What if Gandhi and his followers had confronted Nazi Germany rather than Great Britain?  How effective would Gandhi’s mass-pacifism have been once the Indian people were staring down the barrels of German machine guns enforcing Nazi racial doctrine?

Well, the world no longer needs to wonder about history’s answer to that cynical, hypothetical question.  The answer is no longer hypothetical.  The answer is real and obvious for all to see in the blood-stained no-man’s land surrounding a place called Gaza.

Israeli soldiers are shooting down innocent, unarmed, non-violent – oh yes, I forgot, a very, very few do threaten Israeli peace of mind with their occasional stone-throwing – men and women for no other reason than that they are Palestinians marching for their freedom.

Have you yet seen the video footage of the elderly Palestinian grandmother who decides to enact Kristof’s dream scenario?

Holding a Palestinian flag in her wrinkled hand, she ambles slowly toward the separation fence.  Israeli soldiers, undoubtedly terrorized by this slow-motion charge of an elderly woman, seemingly intent on climbing over the 10-foot fence and beating them to death with her small flag stick, shot her dead while she was still dozens of yards away.

Her knees buckle as a crowd of young people run to help her (watch the first 17 seconds). She falls to the ground and disappears, flag and all, into the green grass.

I wonder what Mr. Kristof has to say now?

Under Israel’s vigilant gaze, every Palestinian commits an unforgivable sin when she will not lay down and play dead.  If you don’t play dead, an Israeli soldier will make you dead.

Palestinians with enough hubris to stand up and insist that they, too, are human beings will quickly be cut down to size.  Including the old women.

The world is now witnessing a demonstration of how those who have been abused assimilate themselves to their abuser.  The victims of the Holocaust have perfected their own brand of genocide rooted in their own doctrine of racial superiority.

The Resurrected Jesus at Work!

I am extremely blessed to be part of a local church that believes one of its major responsibilities is to love the surrounding community.  And the most significant way to love other people is to introduce them to the resurrected Lord, Jesus Christ.

More than 120 people were baptized at the various Easter services our church conducted this past weekend!

Jesus is alive.  He continues to forgive sin, bring us into the waiting arms of our heavenly Father, make us new people, and lead us into new life in the kingdom of God.

Where Palestinian Lives Don’t Matter

17 dead.  773 wounded, or is it 1,400?  How many more victims will there be this week, or in the weeks ahead as Palestinians continue their Land Day protests?

Every victim shot with live ammunition.  Bullets fired at unarmed people standing dozens, if not hundreds, of yards away from the soldiers.  Unarmed marchers and high-powered rifles separated by a steel fence and a wide no-man’s land imposed from on high.

Over 100 snipers staring through high powered scopes.

Deadly shots fired into crowds kneeling in prayer, marching in protest.  Smoke and tear gas wafting through the air, encircling their heads, burning eyes, nose and throat like Hades’ own sulpherous fumes reminding them of hell on earth.

The army is proud, boasting that they know precisely where every bullet landed (a tweet since removed from Twitter). Each death a deliberate murder.  Every injury an intentional maiming.  Every wound a purposeful assault on the image of God.

The largest, most technically advanced military in the Middle East tries to convince us that young men with rocks, slingshots and burning tires pose an “existential threat” (as they say) to nuclear armed Israel.

Perhaps Israeli soldiers now fear deadly smoke inhalation from 100 yards away, as Palestinians cover their faces, sputter and gag against the hundreds of tear gas canisters raining down on their heads.

We are reminded that Palestinian lives don’t matter, not to Israel.

Nor do Palestinian lives matter to America, which once again seeks to block the U.N. resolution condemning the slaughter.  America, the lumbering moral Frankenstein, mesmerized by Israeli propaganda, suffers from a cauterized, national conscience seared like a piece of raw meat by a red-hot iron.

No.  Palestinian lives don’t matter to the United States, where Israeli lobbyists write US foreign policy in the Middle East.  Palestinians are inconvenient human fodder in need of bulldozing by Zionist racism and international neglect.

It is impossible for these Palestinian to make contact with the Israeli soldiers aiming at them from the opposite side of the fence.  Yet, these soldiers posture heroically while discussing the Palestinian “threat” they now mow down by bravely firing remote-controlled machine guns into the Gazan killing fields – the guns’ operators safely sitting many miles away in the Sinai desert.

It is like shooting fish in a barrel, except that these fish are human beings and the barrel is the Gaza Strip, a place that many observers have described as “the world’s largest open-air prison.”

Glenn Greenwald (one of the most important investigative journalists working today) asks a most revealing question, “Imagine if an Arab-majority country were imprisoning 1.8 million Jews in an open-air cage, preventing them from leaving, controlling all aspects of their deprived civic lives, then picking them off with snipers in the back when they protested. Might the reaction be different?”

What would the United States be saying to the United Nations then?

No, Palestinian lives don’t seem to matter, except to their Creator.

The Christian church knows that the Lord God Almighty cares deeply for the Palestinian people, as he does every human being.  And the Lord keeps score. He will not forget their suffering, come judgment day.

  • Please take a few minutes to watch Max Blumenthal – an investigative journalist who has spent a considerable amount of time in Gaza – describe what is happening now.
  • Also, read Gideon Levy’s article containing this lead: “The shooting on the Gaza border shows once again that the killing of Palestinian’s is accepted in Israel more lightly than the killing of mosquitoes.”

Zionist Settlers Attack Palestinian Farmers…Again

Gideon Levy is a brave and principled Israeli journalist.  For years his column in the daily newspaper Haaretz has been a near solitary voice documenting Zionist crimes and abuses against the Palestinian people.

Here is an excerpt from today’s column, “When Settlers Beat Palestinian Fathers in Front of Their Sons.”

“Raafat heard his father screaming in pain. He saw the Israeli draw close and hit his father in the head with his rifle butt, as he lay helpless at the foot of the hill. Raafat recognized the man from an attack the previous week, when he had also acted brutally. Jumaa urged his son to escape, so the thugs wouldn’t hurt him, too.”

I encourage you to read the entire piece and to check in on Mr. Levy’s work in Haaretz regularly, if possible.

Gideon Levy lives with personal bodyguards. He continues to write, travel and speak despite the regular death threats he receives from his fellow citizens.  While similar threats have driven other critics of Zionism from the country, Mr. Levy chooses to remain in Israel.

Gideon Levy is one of my heroes.

His is a prophetic, humane voice crying out for justice and love of neighbor in the midst of a racist Zionist nation, responsible for profligate state-sponsored violence, discrimination and bloodshed.

 

When Police Officers Become Executioners

 

John W. Whitehead, president of the Rutherford Institute and author of the book Battlefield American: The War on the American People, has written an important and very timely article at The Greenville Post.  It is entitled “Enough is Enough: Police Violence Plagues America.”

The ghastly stories about unarmed black citizens, such as Stephon Clark, being gunned down by police officers have become an almost daily occurrence.

It is unconscionable.  It has to change.

Below are the article’s closing paragraphs.  I encourage you to read the entire piece:

“You want to save lives?

“Start by doing something to save the lives of your fellow citizens who are being gunned down every day by police who are trained to shoot first and ask questions later.

“You want to cry about the lives lost during mass shootings?

“Cry about the lives lost as a result of the violence being perpetrated by the U.S. government here at home and abroad.

“If gun control activists really want the country to reconsider its relationship with guns and violence, then it needs to start with a serious discussion about the role our government has played and continues to play in contributing to the culture of violence.”

The gun control movement needs to confront this looming shadow of an increasingly militarized police force that all too frequently (and needlessly) resorts to deadly force, especially when confronting people of color.

Thankfully, African-American students at Parkland High School are beginning to gain some attention as they describe their fears as black citizens living in an increasingly militarized America (here, here, and here, for only a few examples).

FADA Will Legalize Religiously-Based Bigotry

22 Republican senators (including Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Orrin Hatch), led by Mike Lee (R-Utah), are trying for a 3rd time to shepherd the “First Amendment Defense Act” (FADA) through Congress.

Using the 1st amendment’s guarantee of the free exercise of religion, FADA would codify legal discrimination against members of the LGBT community, as well as anyone having sex outside of marriage.

It is an “anti-discrimination” law that would legalize discrimination.

The bill’s language is classically Orwellian.  It states that FADA will “ensure that the Federal Government shall not take any discriminatory action” against those who excuse their own discriminatory actions as a requirement of their religious faith.

In other words, under the guise of “protecting opponents of same-sex marriage,” FADA will legalize discrimination against LGBT people, including heterosexuals guilty of fornication.

There are so many things wrong with this effort, both in its motivation and execution, it is hard to know where to begin.

Not too many years ago, identical “religious liberty” arguments were the foundation stones supporting racist Jim Crow laws throughout this country.  Business owners could legally refuse service to black people and get away with it, because their discrimination expressed a “deeply held” religious conviction.

The passage of time has not improved the fatally flawed logic behind FADA.  Nor has it sweetened the discriminatory stench clinging to its proponents.

Neither can it hide the blatant avarice lying at the root of this legislation.  For it is largely motivated by the love of money.

Reading the bill reveals that, without exception, every example of potential, government “discriminatory action” – the threats to religious freedom that FADA aims to defend against – concerns maintaining an organization’s tax exempt status or other government financial benefits.

In other words, the goal of FADA is to ensure that no one will lose their religiously-based tax breaks, while exercising their right to indulge in religiously-based discrimination.

What hypocrites religious people can be, especially when fighting to protect the preferential status granted by a government tax exemption.

Such people, who insist on defending their place at the public trough, should be expected to keep the same public rules as everyone else.  If they don’t like it, there is a simple solution:  surrender your tax exemption.

Furthermore, the renewed push for FADA is another example of the Religious Right’s persistent lust for social and political power.  It is a quest for control.  Not simply to have a place in the public square, but to control access to the public square.

It is another chapter in the Right’s continuing desire for a new age of Christendom.  In Christendom, the Christian church holds sway over who is in, who is out, and who plays by which rules.  As expressed by FADA, Christians would implement a bizarre misapplication of church discipline to those living outside the church. (I know, my theological slip is showing.  I do believe that the ancient, and entirely Biblical, prohibition against same-sex intimacy is correct and remains legitimate.)

Granted, the courts will continue to have difficult debates on the legal status of the numerous, and highly variable, religious freedom claims brought before them.  But there is no Biblical foundation to the claim being made by certain Christians that faith in Jesus requires them to have no business dealings with LGBT people.

That is a self-righteous distortion of Christian witness.

The apostle Paul confronted this very misapplication of church discipline in 1 Corinthians 5:9-13.  Some members of the church misunderstood Paul’s earlier warning to remain separate from “sexually immoral people.” They mistook him to mean that they couldn’t do business or associate with people outside the church who lived at variance with Paul’s ethical teaching.

However, every Greco-Roman city in Paul’s day was filled with people living any number of alternative, “immoral” lifestyles (as defined by Christian teaching). It was virtually impossible to conduct any type of successful business, including Paul’s own ventures as a traveling tent-maker, without striking deals with such “immoral” customers.

Here is Paul’s correction to the Corinthian mistake:

I did not mean for you to stop associating with the people of this world who are immoral…In that case you would have to leave this world…What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside.

Only a racist, discriminatory, judgmental religion fears compromising its moral values by allowing the faithful to rub shoulders and do business with those unlike themselves.

The 1st amendment already protects that sort of religious bigotry.  There is no law against being a religious white supremacist.  But neither should there be a law guaranteeing the tax-exempt status of religious bigots who trample on the laws protecting equal access to the public square for everyone else.

The Morning the Elders Walked Out on Me

It has happened to me before, but not by so many – and at both services!

I believe that every church elder in the first service, and several congregants and/or visitors in the second service, walked out at the midpoint of my message.

More than that, the elders called me into a meeting between services to tell me why they were so upset and to suggest changes to my next message.  I learned later that one elder wanted to stop me from speaking again altogether.

What did I say that was so upsetting?

No, I was not deconstructing the Trinity or denying Jesus’ incarnation.  Those might have been messages worth boycotting.

My message title was “Seeking God’s Kingdom First and Foremost.”  The Bible passage was basically the Sermon on the Mount, focusing especially on Matthew 6:33, “But seek God’s kingdom and God’s righteousness first, and all these others things (i.e. food and clothing) will be added to you.”

After surveying the specific kingdom righteousness insisted upon by Jesus (reread the Sermon on the Mount) – that is, mercy, peace-making, non-retaliation, non-violence, forgiveness, servanthood, etc. – I then turned to the question of practical application.

Specifically, how might the American church behave differently if everyone claiming to follow Jesus truly lived out Jesus’ command in Matthew 6:33?

What might it look like for our kingdom citizenship to trump (no pun intended, but what’s a writer to do?) our American citizenship?

How should Jesus’ kingdom righteousness over-rule popular views of American righteousness?

Then I got specific. I said, Let’s focus on the priority of being non-violent, merciful peacemakers living in American, the greatest purveyor of death, violence and destruction in the world today.  What should that do to us?  What should we be doing ourselves?

So, I offered a few examples, illustrated with readily available information that every American can look up for themselves.

  • The United States is the largest arms dealer in the world, selling almost half of the military weapons purchased by other developing countries.
  • The United States is arming and enabling Saudi Arabia’s assault on the people of Yemen, contributing to what is now the largest humanitarian crisis in the world.
  • Many hundreds of thousands of people have been killed directly or indirectly during our unending wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, many of whom have been innocent civilians blandly labeled “collateral damage.”

I then suggested that Christians ought to be appalled by America’s participation in such horrors. We can never endorse, much less support, such ruthless destruction.

In fact, as kingdom citizens who are also citizens of a supposed democracy, we should take advantage of the political means at our disposal to speak out, object and strive to change our nation’s addiction to bloodshed and warfare.

THAT is a part of what it means for disciples to be “salt and light in this world” (Matthew 5:11-16).

I then suggested a few practical, local avenues available to those who want to do something in a hands-on way.

Well, the exodus began well before I was even half-way through the statistics on American war-making.  The elders explained that they walked out because I had stopped talking about Jesus and instead “turned to politics.”  The Jesus part was great.  Then the politics ruined everything.

I was told that a church service ought to be a “safe place” for everyone.

Oh my.  Where to being?

My experience provides a text-book example of SO many of the things that have gone wrong with the American church.

  • Since when is worshiping the Holy One and hearing divine revelation supposed to make me always feel safe? Try telling that to Moses as he trembled before the burning bush (Exodus 3:1-6).
  • When honestly proclaimed, the gospel of Jesus Christ comforts the afflicted while afflicting the comfortable.  And the American church is filled with an abundance of oh-so-comfortable people. After all, that is the primary reason many attend church in the first place, to be comfortably confirmed in their comfort zones.
  • This nationalistic, play-it-safe attitude was exactly the mindset of the German Christian church in the 1930s and ‘40s, filled with Nazi sympathizers supporting Adolf Hitler. (See the discussion of this phenomenon in my new book, I Pledge Allegiance: A Believer’s Guide to Kingdom Citizenship in 21st-Century America). I suspect that these folks would have happily listened to politics had it been their brand of Christian nationalist politics. (Actually, I am still mystified as to why raw facts and figures are heard as bad politics…).
  • Recall that Jesus’ says, “Woe to you when everyone has only good things to say about you!” ( Luke 6:26).  In other words, the church is in big trouble if our mission is only to help people feel safe and secure.
  • This sad attitude is perhaps the most damning indication of the American captivity of the church, happily enslaved to US consumerism and the self-help gospel of wealth and success.
  • I strongly suspect that most of these folks are afflicted with consciences horribly numbed by Fox News idolatry. This network has been a scourge in our country and has almost single-handedly transformed historic conservatism (a respectable tradition) into an ungodly, mean-spirited, narrow-minded mob fueled by idolatrous, nationalistic propaganda. Honestly, any “Christian” who depends on Fox as his/her sole/primary source of news and political information ought to repent and be ashamed, be very ashamed.
  • The gospel has always been inherently political. This can only be avoided by truncating the truth. Politics concerns itself with a people’s governance, the management of public interaction/conversation and the exercise of state power. Once you acknowledge the universal sovereignty of the Lord Jesus, become a citizen of the global kingdom of God and submit yourself to Jesus’ instruction in kingdom ethics, it becomes impossible to avoid open confrontation with the public powers-that-be.  Especially when they demand an allegiance contrary to Christ’s rule.
  • Fortunately, the African-American church in this country has always understood this.  Predominantly white churches need to listen and learn from our black brothers and sisters in Christ. We have much to learn. And they have a wealth of experience to share.
  • The fact that these obvious conflicts of interests (and power) go unrecognized by so many (white) folks calling themselves Christians, and then cause such discomfort and bizarre behavior when discussed from the pulpit, illustrates the widespread, colossal failure of American church leaders to engage the gospel fully and to discuss the broad spectrum of its practical application in their teaching.
  • We need to change.

Alas, I could go on, but I will stop here…for now.

P.S.  I must add that after both services, I received much more positive feedback from people who understood the issues involved and were eager to follow Jesus obediently in this dimension of their lives, too.  All in all, it was an encouraging day that demonstrated the Holy Spirit’s work in a way that, I trust, is representative of the church at large.

Our Lives Matter and the Church #nra #ourlivesmatter

As an avid outdoors-man and hunter, I own a few shotguns.  Yet, every sensible citizen will recognize that America, and that includes the American church, has a serious problem not shared by any other country in the world – rampant gun violence.

Looking west, people fill Pennsylvania Avenue during the “March for Our Lives” rally in support of gun control, Saturday, March 24, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Hoping to build on the success of the #Black Lives Matter movement (and here), young people of all ethnicities across the country are marching today in the #Our Lives Matter Campaign (also here). Their commitment to speaking out, activism, demonstration, political engagement, non-violence and civil discourse is inspiring, convicting and hopeful.

Perhaps the need for gun reform in this country will not be pushed onto the

People take part in a march rally against gun violence Saturday, March 24, 2018, in New York. Tens of thousands of people poured into the nation’s capital and cities across America on Saturday to march for gun control and ignite political activism among the young. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle)

back burners this time, as it always has been in the past.

As the principle advocates for non-violence in our world, Christians should support and participate in this important moment in our history, expanding the conversation beyond gun control.

Here are a few of my thoughts on the basic principles (in no particular order) that need to be understood for any civil conversation about gun control to move forward

Protestors carry placards and shout slogans during a demonstration calling for greater gun control, outside the US Embassy in south London on March 24, 2018.
The London rally, in solidarity with the US movement ‘March For Our Lives’, is one of hundreds of gun control protests taking place globally. / AFP PHOTO / Tolga AKMEN (Photo credit should read TOLGA AKMEN/AFP/Getty Images)

positively.

  1. We need to recognize that the NRA is not a citizens’ organization. It is not defending anyone’s civil rights. The NRA is a lobbying organization that works exclusively for the financial benefit of gun manufacturers.

2. Thus, the NRA will continue to do whatever it can to block new gun control measures. The NRA has changed considerably from the days when it worked with President Roosevelt to pass the first federal gun control laws (the 1934 National Firearms Act and the 1938 Gun Control Act). Those days are long gone.

3. A crucial element in any future success must involve cutting off NRA funding to our elected representatives. Or voting them out of office. This will require lots of effort and grassroots organizing.

4. No sensible person is arguing that there is a single “silver bullet” (pun intended) solution that can end all mass shootings or other violent gun-crimes.

5. But understanding that no “one thing” will solve all our gun violence problems is never a reason for doing nothing at all, as many seem to suggest.

6. Effective solutions will be multi-faceted. Tightening restrictions on gun ownership will be only one element of a much bigger picture. We need a national conversation with a wide range of expertise and experience at the table.

7. Whatever the original intent of the Second Amendment – some argue it was intended to allow citizens to protect themselves from oppressive government; others argue that it was to permit armed militias to defend the government against citizen revolt – the framers never envisioned the type of weaponry being used today.

8. I am sorry, but no civilian has “a right” to own and operate whatever type of lethal armaments they choose. Certainly not if such ownership is free of any and all government regulation or oversight.  Remember, there was a time when people could drive cars without a license.  Not anymore.

9. No “right” stands in splendid isolation, independent of social responsibility. The 1st amendment does not give me the right to recklessly cream “Fire!” in a crowded theater.  Is irresponsible speech more dangerous than an AR-15 equipped with a bump-stock and a high capacity magazine?

10. Yes, all lives matter equally. We can rejoice that a nation-wide movement for gun control seems finally to have begun.  Yet, let’s also recognize and confess the latent racism brought to the surface in American society when it requires multiple mass shooting of principally white victims before the issue becomes front page news.