I tried listening to a conservative, call-in radio program last night. Five to ten minutes was all I could take before my bleeding ears forced me to change the station.
The topic of conversation was the “invasion” of immigrants “flooding” across America’s southern border.
The first thing I noticed was the ignorance on display about the average person’s living circumstances in Central American countries where the U.S. has toppled governments in the recent past. The second and most prominent factor was the hard-hearted lack of empathy or compassion voiced by both the bloviating host and his lynch-mob minded callers.
It was painful to listen.
The ability to empathize – that is, feel an impulse for putting ourselves in another person’s place, to understand their pain, to try to feel what they are feeling as they are feeling it – is an important trait for every human being to possess. Some would say it is part of what makes us human.
Unfortunately, not everyone can do it. Many don’t ever try.
Both sociopaths and psychopaths can be identified by their inability, or well-practiced disinterest, in feeling empathy. So, they can skin cats alive and watch other people suffer without experiencing a twinge of concern or human kindness.
I can only hope that a high percentage of psychopaths make evening calls to conservative radio talk shows . Otherwise, America really is in deep trouble.
Perhaps you have heard the old saying about empathy: Before you criticize another person first walk a mile in his shoes. Then when you do criticize him you will be a mile away AND have his shoes.
At least, that seems to be the American, conservative understanding of empathy nowadays.
The painful lack of public empathy that I witnessed last night is also glaring evidence that many Americans who call themselves Christians do not know Jesus Christ from a hole in the ground, no matter what their “testimony.”
Empathy is THE cardinal Christian virtue.
The incarnation of Jesus Christ was/is the supreme demonstration of divine empathy. The Father’s empathy for us, lost sinners, motivated him to send
his one and only eternal Son into this world. Empathy for humanity moved the Son to become fully human; to experience all that we experience; and to stick with it for an entire lifetime. He walked in our shoes, carried our burdens, suffered injustice, died our death, and finally experienced resurrection as our Precursor.
To know Jesus is to know empathy.
To be like Jesus is to demonstrate empathy for others, but especially for those who are the most “unlike” us. The Son of God was UTTERLY unlike sinful humanity in every way. Yet, He set aside all privilege in order to rescue undeserving, ungrateful, self-destructive people like you and me.
The kingdom of God is a kingdom founded on empathy for others unlike ourselves.
It is a kingdom founded upon practical action to meet others in their suffering and to alleviate their distress, to bring practical solutions to human dilemmas, to save life, to make more room for those seeking safety, to share whatever we have with those who have lost everything.
Without empathy there is no such thing as Christianity.
Without empathy there is no discipleship.
Without visible demonstrations of practical empathy there is no Christian Church.
Without empathy there is no hope for the human race or the planet.
The El Paso gunman left behind a manifesto proclaiming his allegiance to white supremacy, decrying the dangerous hordes of brown immigrants “flooding” across our southern border. I haven’t heard any details yet about the shooter in Ohio, his motives or political ideology.
At least, law enforcement has begun to describe these horrific incidents for what they are: domestic terrorism.
The FBI continues to warn that the vast majority of these incidents are committed by right-wing political extremists who are, without exception, white men. In most cases, their targets are people of color. Nowadays, anyone who looks like they might be Hispanic or Muslim is scrutinized without mercy.
Look at YouTube to watch the many videos posted there showing the white vigilantes who have deputized themselves to harass people of color. They call the police because they overheard someone speaking a different language, or saw a black person walking through the neighborhood and “looking suspicious while being black.”
No informed citizen with an ounce of common sense can deny the overt,
blatant, explicit encouragement that such anti-immigrant, white, racist extremism is receiving from the White House.
If you don’t understand or believe that previous sentence then, I am sorry, but you are lost.
You need to be converted.
Your conscience has been swallowed up by the swamp of moral relativism and outright evil that has taken hold of this country’s public life, especially within the comfortable parlors of political conservatism, Republicanism and establishment D.C. power brokers.
And, yes, that moral degeneration includes the Democrats as well as anyone else who remains silent while the newest wave of neo-Nazis, skin-heads, neo-fascists and every other stripe of authoritarian race-baiter feels that this moment in our nation’s history is their opportunity to resurrect the Confederate flag and wave a banner of white, racial superiority over the graves of innocent men, women and children whose skin-tone carries too much melanin.
But I reserve my strongest condemnation for conservative evangelicals who continue to endorse this president’s policies and turn a blind eye to the daily dose of hatred spewing forth from his puerile and filthy mouth.
He is the latest anti-Christ who has risen up to deceive the church; like a false prophet crying, “Peace, peace!” while he sows seeds of hatred, lies and racial division.
Everyone likes to imagine they would have been a hero in Hitler’s Germany. We all tell ourselves, “I would have resisted. I would have hidden Jews in MY attic. I would never have allowed the Nazi flag in MY church. The Fuehrer’s censors would have never have been allowed to edit MY sermons.”
We swear that we would have been a faithful Israelite, never to be counted among the idolaters that sent the nation into exile.
We would have been faithful disciples. Unlike Simon Peter, we would have spoken up in Jesus’ defense when the time came.
Well, folks now is the moment, another moment of truth.
Another opportunity for faithfulness to Christ is staring us in the face. The question is – what will we, what can we, do?
I have a few suggestions:
Every church, and every member of every church, located in a town, village, city or unincorporated township with a population of dark-skinned immigrants needs to walk door-to-door through those neighborhoods, shaking hands and offering hugs, help and resources while welcoming those people of color into your community. Listen to their stories. Ask if there is anything you and/or your church community can do to help meet their needs. Then follow through, and do it. Make new friends. Have them over to your home; eat together and publicly testify to their humanity at every opportunity. Push for your church to become a more inter-racial community, if it isn’t already.
Challenge all racist, white-nationalist types of conversation whenever, wherever you hear it – especially among Christians. Remind people that Jesus of Nazareth was a very brown-skinned, Palestinian Jew who had once been an immigrant himself seeking safety in a foreign land (Egypt). We worship a dark-skinned Savior. Avoid fights, but faithfully and boldly represent the universal love of God for all people everywhere.
Remind people that there is a difference between illegal immigration and seeking asylum. Asylum-seeking is perfectly legal. In fact, I believe that America owes automatic asylum – even citizenship – to anyone fleeing a dangerous situation in a country that has been destabilized by U.S. intervention, whether military, political or economic. THAT, my friends, includes the whole of Central and South America. When the United States helps to destroy the social fabric of a nation by forcing it to adopt policies that serve American interests first, then we must take responsibility for the human fall-out. (Personally, I also believe that illegal immigration ought to be decriminalized. We would still have border guards patrolling the southern border humanely, seeking to care for the people they detain and send back, but what is the point of jailing these people as felons after their second capture? It serves no purpose but to enrich those who own America’s private, for-profit prison/detention system.)
I haven’t touched on the many related issues such as the American gun lobby, gun ownership, etc. because I don’t want this post to become a book. We could also talk about the policy of separating children from their parents when detained at the border, and the fact that our government admits to having “lost track” of nearly 1,500 of these children. Imagine if they were your children…
Urge your pastor to talk about these issues in the context of obedient Christian discipleship. It is obvious and easy to “pray for the victims” of a mass shooting. Perhaps, it is the pastoral thing to do. But think about it: what good did it do for patriotic, German pastors to offer nice pastoral prayers for those who were being arrested and tortured by Hitler’s SS guards, while remaining silent about the immoral policies being implemented by those unjust arrests? The church needs more than safe, pastoral prayers for victims. We need strong leadership and pointed Biblical teaching that identifies immorality and injustice in the public square; that gives direction to God’s counter-cultural ways of kingdom living in a nation wrestling with its own racist demons.
Those cartels use local gangs of enforcers to extort protection money from poor and middle-class business owners, often driving them out of business and killing anyone refusing to cooperate. These gangs, operating with the
silent approval of government leaders, are the primary cause of Honduras’ skyrocketing murder rate.
So, guess what. The U.S. bears the lion share of responsibility for the problems facing Honduras today.
If this is not familiar to you, please take a few minutes to watch two video
explanations. The first features Lucy Pagoada, an Honduran immigrant explaining the situation in her native country, and why she fled to the United States.
The second is an episode of On Contact with Chris Hedges. He interviews Professor Dana Frank, author of the book The Long Honduran Night: Resistance, Terror and the United States in the
Aftermath of the Coup. She poignantly explains America’s role in transforming Honduras into a failed state.
Now, President Trump is threatening to close America’s southern border. He refuses to receive any more applicants for asylum and is ending all foreign aid to Honduras, Guatemala and San Salvador (two additional nations where the U.S. has meddled with disastrous effect).
So, let me get this straight. First, we intervene in these nation’s internal affairs. We help to overthrow the Honduran government and install a corrupt dictatorship.
Then we support that dictatorship even as it enriches itself at the people’s
expense by allying itself with violent drug cartels. We stand by and watch as the dictators’ neo-liberal economic policies exacerbate poverty, unemployment and violent crime because those policies benefit U.S. corporate interests.
Then when the poorest of the poor flee for their lives, seeking asylum and a better life in the U.S., our esteemed president stigmatizes them as criminals, rapists, the “worst of the worst.”
He takes away their children, locks them into cages, loses hundreds if not thousands of those children due to poor record keeping, and closes the
border. For the coup de’grace he orders border patrol agents to shoot these helpless, refugee families with tear gas and rubber bullets.
All the while, President Trump continues his xenophobic rants insisting that this southern “invasion” – vast weaponized caravans of brown invaders intent on destroying the American way of life – is THE greatest national security threat facing our country today.
And many Americans listen. Too many are persuaded.
They are persuaded because they have never bothered to follow the news. They are persuaded because don’t know anything about our history of
Central American interventions.
Worse yet, they don’t care to learn.
They are too busy gulping down the poisonous swill of U.S. exceptionalism to hear the cries of innocent Hondurans crushed beneath the colossus of American geopolitical power.
We are witnessing a textbook definition of oppression unfolding before our eyes. It is more than a national disgrace; it is wickedness incarnate.
Last Wednesday, Nancy Pelosi reintroduced the Equality Act for the Congressional Democrats.
The Equality Act is a bill that aims to eliminate discrimination against LGBTQ people in the same way that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed discrimination against African-Americans.
Predictably, the Religious Right is up in arms denouncing the bill as another assault upon religious liberty in general, and Christianity in particular.
But is it any such thing? Personally, I don’t see it.
I am old enough to remember the 1950s and 60s. A southern block of religious conservatives then described Dr. Martin Luther King as a communist tool of the devil. They fought to kill any hopes of passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Furthermore, they staunchly defended racial segregation as an expression of their Christian faith, just as so many religious conservatives are now condemning the Equality Act as an attack on their Christian views of human sexuality and marriage.
Andrew T. Walker of The Gospel Coalition has an article entitled, “The Equality Act Accelerates Anti-Christian Bias.” He warns that “the bill represents the most invasive threat to religious liberty ever proposed in America.”
Monica Burke at the Daily Signal writes that the bill will cause “profound harms to Americans from all walks of life” under the heading “7 Reasons Why the Equality Act is Anything But.”
But even if some judicial tweaking is required as our society navigates the social effects of this new legislation, I have yet to see anyone explain away the fundamental parallels between African-Americans in need of the 1964 Civil Tights Act and gay/transgendered Americans in need of similar protections in 2019.
Christianity in America was not destroyed in 1964, despite the explicit warnings of Christian racists.
Neither will American Christianity come to ruin if gay, lesbian and transgendered human beings are granted similar civil rights protections in 2019, despite the apocalyptic warnings coming from the doomsday, propaganda mills of the Religious Right.
Instead, what this debate reveals is something much more dangerous now deeply rooted in the heart of American evangelicalism/fundamentalism: an insistence that the Christian religion (as defined by highly politicized, partisan, social conservatives) deserves preferential treatment in America; indeed, that this politicized, culture-warrior view of Christianity must become normative for acceptable social behavior in the public square.
I discuss this misunderstanding of Christian citizenship at length in my book, I Pledge Allegiance: A Believer’s Guide to Kingdom Citizenship in 21st Century America (Eerdmans, 2018). This country’s politicized brand of Christianity is a tangled mess of confusion over what is required from citizens in the kingdom of God living as citizens in a secular society.
Mr. Walker throws out the predictably fawning, meaningless sop intended to distract his critics by saying, “To be clear, Christians reject all forms of invidious discrimination. We believe all persons, including those who identify as LGBT, are made in God’s image and deserve respect, kindness, and neighborliness.”
Well, good for you, Mr. Walker.
But pledges of personal affection are no substitute for legal guarantees.
The entrenched racism of the Jim Crow south also declared, ever so kindly, that they loved their black folks and always treated them with nothing but love and kindness, often insisting that their contented “Negroes” were just fine with the status quo.
Then the Civil Rights movement came along.
Turned out that African-Americans weren’t as contented as the white people imagined.
Unfortunately, the conservative Christian church has lost its ability to speak with any moral authority on issues of justice and equality, because its pronouncements are generally selfish and self-centered.
Conservative Christians confuse the church with the world and the world with the church – which is odd given their tendencies towards intellectual and social isolation. New Testament morality is directed at kingdom citizens filled with the Holy Spirit, not the world at large, however beneficial its approximation would be. (I discuss this issue at length inI Pledge Allegiance.)
Too many would-be Christians simply do not want to love (not really, not with actual tolerance and loving-kindness in person, face-to-face) the people they don’t like, or don’t agree with, or see as the unclean enemies of their beloved Christian civilization. Let’s get real – many evangelicals are homophobes (though I do not like that term). They don’t want anyone telling them that they must accept gay/transgendered people as equally human with the same dignity as anyone else, whether in the workplace, at school or anywhere else.
They fail to distinguish personal preference from public accommodation. The Equality Act addresses issues concerning “public accommodation.” Read the entire bill here. The core of the legislation simply requires equal treatment, saying:
The Department of Justice (DOJ) may bring a civil action if it receives a complaint from an individual who claims to be:
denied equal utilization of a public facility owned, operated, or managed by a state (other than public schools or colleges) on account of sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity; or
denied admission to, or not permitted to continue attending, a public college by reason of sexual orientation or gender identity, thereby expanding DOJ’s existing authority to bring such actions for complaints based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
The bill revises public school desegregation standards to provide for the assignment of students without regard to sexual orientation or gender identity.
The bill prohibits programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance from denying benefits to, or discriminating against, persons based on sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
Most of the protests I have seen are in reaction to the protection of transgender rights and its various implications for public space/accomodation.
On this score, the conservative church must get to grip with two problems.
One, we have to enter the age of modern research science and recognize that many (a majority?) of gay people are born gay. For them, there is no therapeutic cure. Insisting otherwise discredits us and guarantees that we will never really understand the struggles of our gay friends and neighbors.
Two, there is a good chance that similar genetic issues are in play for people suffering gender dysphoria. I have no idea how it must feel to spend my life tormented by the sense of being trapped in the wrong body. I doubt very much if anybody decides or chooses to live such an existence. There is obviously a great deal yet to be discovered in this arena. The church needs to stop prejudging such people, their histories, situations and motivations while accepting that transgendered people merit the same legal protections as everyone else.
The Equality Act will not affect the policies or operations of churches and other religious institutions unless those facilities accept federal funding. The obligatory cries of religious persecution, or the loss of religious freedoms are actually laments about the possible loss of federal dollars. It’s about the money, folks.
Losing one’s tax exempt status is not anti-religious discrimination. Actually, I have long believed that the tax exemption for churches is actually discrimination against the surrounding community. Why should the church’s neighbors be required to pay more for their community services (which is what happens) in the way of a public subsidy for the tax-exempt churches, which most of them don’t attend anyway?
The same logic applies to religious schools, colleges, hospitals, etc. These types of institutions will only be affected by the Equality Act if they accept federal financial support. Far too many of these groups want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to benefit from public money (supplied through our tax dollars) while enforcing their own, private sectarian policies.
That is hypocrisy.
You can’t have it both ways and hope to remain anywhere within the ethical ballpark. Remember when Bob Jones University went to court because it insisted on collecting federal money while continuing to refuse admission to black applicants? (I don’t know why any African-American would want to go there. But, to each his own.)
I do.
If a religious institution believes that it cannot abide by the Equality Act, then let them surrender their federal grants, subsidies, or what-have-you. Yes, this will also mean that students receiving federal scholarships or other tuition assistance will either lose their grants or be required to look for another college. This is one of those arenas where details would need to be worked out in the courts, perhaps.
Let’s face it. Way too much of the energy invested in these types of fights by Christian social organizations basically boil down to a fight for comfort and/or money. Christians want to relax in a culture that accommodates itself to them. We don’t want inconvenient types, like gays, or lesbians, or transsexuals, the kinds of people who challenge our conservative expectations in the moral, social order to raise questions or challenge the status quo. A status quo that allows us to remain relaxed and in control.
It is long past time for American politicized Christianity to stop acting as if (a) fighting for a Christianized public square were the same thing as (b) being an faithful citizen of the kingdom of God in public. The two are not the same thing. In fact, they are two very, very different things.
(This is the first in a three-part series on class warfare in the U.S.)
Americans have been fighting a serious class war for at least the past 30+ years, and the lower classes, especially the poor, are getting the stuffing beaten out of them. Few people want to talk openly about America’s class war, but it’s a fact.
The church needs to get to grips with it.
Instead of siding with the rich time after time, the people of God must stand up for the poor. We need to recognize that our current tax policy, which serve as a major offensive weapon in the billionaires’ arsenal against the poor, is a moral catastrophe.
Did you agree with President Trump’s tax-cut plan passed by Congress last year? Did you cheer for his budget with its massive increases for the nation’s military-industrial-surveillance complex?
If you said Yes to either of those questions, then you supported a HUGE transfer of wealth that was taken away from the poor and the middle-class, and handed over to the rich and that new class of “people” called corporations.
THAT, my friends, is class warfare waged through the utterly undemocratic processes of Washington D.C., where the majority of our politicians are bought and paid for by millionaires, billionaires and corporate lobbyists. They don’t represent you and me. They represent big money.
We all need to get over the long out-of-date Cold War fear of saying anything that might sound even slightly Marxist (oooohhh, the big, bad boogy man…) and recognize that our society has been viciously twisted by a brutal 30+ year, class war being waged from the top down.
That war has empowered America’s richest families and biggest corporations to stomp the needy into the ground – not only in this country, but around the world. (Read John Perkin’s book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man; The Inside Story of How American Really Took Over the World, to learn about just one example of the international scope of America’s economic war against the poor).
As I demonstrate in my book, I Pledge Allegiance (see pages 155 – 157), it was not Karl Marx but Jesus Christ who insisted on building a just society – beginning with the Christian church – where everyone’s needs could be met, and no one need go without. Ages before Karl M. was even a glimmer in his father’s eye, Jesus’ church was living by a definite code: “from each according to your ability; to each according to your need.”
That’s right. Marx was ripping off Jesus.
Recently, the newly elected Congresswoman, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, suggested raising the upper tax bracket to 70%. Naturally, like robotic guard dogs hardwired for mindless assaults against anything that threatens their gold-plated, private communities and the corporate powers-that-be, the usual conservative, Republican and DINO (Democrats in name only) suspects have uniformly attacked this young, bright politician.
Paul Krugman (a Nobel Prize winning economist) is absolutely correct in applauding Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s view of taxation. Take a look at his latest editorial, “The Economics of Soaking the Rich.” Below is a brief excerpt, but you should read the entire piece:
“I have no idea how well Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will perform as a member of Congress. But her election is already serving a valuable purpose. You see, the mere thought of having a young, articulate, telegenic nonwhite woman serve is driving many on the right mad — and in their madness they’re inadvertently revealing their true selves…
“The controversy of the moment involves AOC’s advocacy of a tax rate of 70-80 percent on very high incomes, which is obviously crazy, right? I mean, who thinks that makes sense? Only ignorant people like … um, Peter Diamond, Nobel laureate in economics and arguably the world’s leading expert on public finance…And it’s a policy nobody has ever implemented, aside from … the United States, for 35 years after World War II — including the most successful period of economic growth in our history.”
Did you know that during the post-war period Krugman refers to, the upper
tax bracket in this country was 90%? That’s right. The richest Americans paid 90% in taxes on a portion of their income.
Many people fail to understand this point, and the pundits who feign moral outrage at such suggestions will never explain this point in public. After all, they are not trying to inform; they are working to protect their own financial interests.
When someone like Rep. Ocasio-Cortez suggests implementing a 70% tax rate, it does not mean that every American would pay a 70% tax on every dollar earned. Not at all.
It means that the wealthiest Americans (and corporations) in the highest tax
brackets would pay a 70% tax on a portion of their total income. What portion would be decided in negotiations over the subsequent budget changes.
That’s called “from each according to your ability.” I also call it good sense.
If Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican president, could smile on a 90% tax bracket fueling a healthy post-war economy, then why can’t today’s Congress embrace a 70% tax bracket; especially when we are repeatedly told that our current economy is booming?
Simple.
First, far too many of our elected representatives are millionaires or richer! The typical member of Congress is 12x wealthier than the typical American family. Time Magazine referred to Congress as the millionaires’ club. How enthusiastic will these people be at the thought of raising their own taxes?
Second, Washington D.C., and the American public, continue to be mesmerized by the dark enchantment of a mythical, fire-breathing monster called “trickle-down economics.” This farcical tax policy was conjured up from the pit by President Ronald Reagan, the national bamboozler-extraordinaire. Others have relabeled it supply-side economics or Reaganomics. But call it what you will, it remains the same destructive strategy for continually enriching the rich while further impoverishing the poor.
Only one thing “trickles down” from the powerful billionaires standing on top of you in this class battle. Take a guess at what it is. (I’ll give you a hint: it ain’t well paid jobs or affordable health care.)
Here is some more analysis from a real economist, Paul Krugman. Also, please look at the impressive graph included in this part of his article:
“You see, Republicans almost universally advocate low taxes on the wealthy, based on the claim that tax cuts at the top will have huge beneficial effects on the economy [the supposed ‘trickle-down’ effect]. This claim rests on research by … well, nobody. There isn’t any body of serious work supporting G.O.P. tax ideas, because the evidence is overwhelmingly against those ideas…[emphasis mine]
“Why do Republicans adhere to a tax theory that has no support from nonpartisan economists and is refuted by all available data? Well, ask who benefits from low taxes on the rich, and it’s obvious.
“And because the party’s coffers demand adherence to nonsense economics, the party prefers ‘economists’ who are obvious frauds and can’t even fake their numbers effectively.”
Yes, the multi-millionaire, Ronald Reagan (worth $10.6 million in 1981 dollars when he took the president’s office) launched a new, immoral class war against the poor and the middle-class. Reagan whipped up irrational – even racist – hostilities against “big government” and supposedly ghetto dwelling “welfare queens” in order to sell his political snake oil dressed up as a tax plan. However, the real goal was producing a vast economic benefit for Reagan’s friends and campaign donors, members of an exclusive club I call the Triple-Bs: Billionaires and Big Business.
The working poor, the needy, the destitute, and even the middle-class, have been losing ground ever since. That lost ground includes their homes, jobs, savings accounts, educational opportunities, health care and government assistance.
It is long past time for the conservative church, all those who consistently vote Republican, to wake up and smell the coffee.
You have been naïve (perhaps) but not guiltless co-conspirators in the heartless exploitation of America’s poor and needy, our children, our sick, and our elderly. It is time to rip off the cruel partisan blinders, repent of our selfishness and confess, “Yes, we need the politics of Jesus!”
From each according to your abilities. To each according to your needs.
I have noted a number of similar stories over the years. This is the latest.
I have noted a number of similar situations over the years. Last year I saw a story about a drunk, white man threatening traffic in his neighborhood with a high-powered, hunting rifle. Again, the police found a peaceful way to apprehend the man without using their guns.
Honestly, now, what are the chances this woman (or the man I describe above) would have been shot if she/he were black?
Don’t get me wrong. I am in total agreement with Mr. Maxwell’s commentary. I am happy to see police officers use non-violent methods, that do not include a firearm, to remedy such situations.
I am afraid, however, that any American who follows the news in this arena will have to agree that when a black person behaves in a way even remotely similar to this, she/he will be shot by the police. We have seen it time and again.
Of course, white lives matter, too. But the fact is that white people are not arrested, harassed, shot, injured or imprisoned (unjustly) in this country at anywhere near the rates of black people It is a simple fact
Every Christian, every Christian church, every person of conscience needs to vocally support this movement, in whatever ways you are able.
For every white person in this country, such support is a minimal step that everyone can take towards loving our neighbor and treating others as we would hope to be treated ourselves.
The report summarized a number of government intelligence assessments and warned that a growing movement of “right wing extremist movements” posed the greatest threat of political violence and domestic terrorism in the United States.
As soon as the report was made public (which was not its original purpose), Republican Congressional leaders, together with a litany of conservative commentators, raised a hue and cry condemning the report, lambasting the DHS, and screaming for the heads of anyone — especially “liberals” or Democrats — who tried to engage in a serious discussion of the report’s findings.
Sadly, none of this was the least bit surprising coming from the conservative-Republican establishment which remains anti-science, anti-evidence, anti-logic, and anti-anything-that-calls-for critical self-assessment.
Of course, the DHS report was immediately suppressed. You probably have never heard of it. As a result, the nation never had an open public conversation about the rising terrorist threat in this country, and why it was emanating from the right-wing.
It is impossible to have a productive conversation when one side can’t stop denying the facts, as Sarah Huckabee-Sanders continues to do almost every day.
“Right-wing extremists have been one of the largest and most consistent sources of domestic terror incidents in the United States for many years, a fact that has not gotten the attention it deserves.”
Facts cannot be ignored. They willeventually have their own way, whether we like it or not.
The rank cowardice displayed by the mainstream and the right-wing media guarantees that the public remains steeped in ignorance on this issue. Daily we hear the mindless, false equivalencies and bogus comparisons. Pundits insist that both sides are to blame; everyone needs to compromise; the right and the left must meet somewhere in the middle.
The Republican party moves in a more and more extremist direction, yet anyone who points this out is accused of polarizing the debate.
What absolute rubbish! It simply is not true.
The right-wing is to blame. It is a fact, plain and simple. No one benefits from a lie.
There is something about conservatism and its social, political rhetoric that, especially when taken to an extreme, becomes fertile soil for unstable people prone to violence.
We all — but especially God’s people — must be more concerned with the truth than we are with partisan defensiveness. This means being open to correction. Being willing to learn. To admit when we have been wrong.
And most of all, we must be willing to change.
Tragically, evangelical Christianity persists in unapologetically identifying itself with a right-wing political movement that has blood on its hands.
Yes, that’s right.
Congressman Boehner, Fox News, and every other conservative spokesperson who helped to muzzled the DHS warning in 2009, who plugged their ears to the ADL report in 2017, who still refuses to admit the self-evident connection between Trump’s violent rhetoric — which has repeatedly embraced and advocated more violence — and the racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant terrorism dragging itself mercilessly across our country, all have blood on their hands.
Hardly a week goes by without another story appearing about a black citizen, often unarmed, who is killed by the police.
The latest story concerns the death of Botham Jean. Mr. Jean was shot in his own apartment by an off-duty police officer, Amber Guyer.
According to officer Guyger, who lived in the same apartment complex, she mistakenly entered the Mr. Jean’s apartment after dark. Seeing a menacing black man standing in what she believed was the front room of her apartment, she shot him.
Pause for a moment and see how many obvious questions that very odd scenario raises in your mind.
A neighbor, however, reports that he heard banging on Mr. Jean’s door and then a conversation between Jean and Guyger. Ms. Guyger is alleged to have yelled, “let me in.”
The Texas rangers are investigating.
Call me kooky, but forgive me for not trusting the police to police themselves.
Mr. Jean’s family describes him as a Christian man, active in his local church. He had never been arrested, nor had he ever had a run-in with the police, that is until officer Guyger shot him dead.
Ms. Guyger was arrested briefly and released on her own recognizance after only a few hours. She seems to have used some of that time to scrub her computer. I wonder why. Oddly, she forgot to erase her Pinterest page which contains a good deal of hateful, violent and racist material.
Mr. Jean, on the other hand, has suffered from post-mortem character assassination. The police quickly obtained a warrant to search his apartment. Apparently, in Dallas, Texas being the unarmed, black victim of a police shooting — in your own home, no less — is reason enough to be suspected of criminal activity.
The police didn’t discover any weapons but reportedly uncovered a bag of marijuana.
Excuse me again if I take another moment to pause and wonder if that bag was planted by the officers conducting the search. After all, for some police departments, planting evidence is more common than shooting unarmed people in their homes (see here and here).
Only in the twisted world of Fox News is the ex post facto discovery of a bag of marijuana relevant to the killing of an unarmed man with no criminal record.
But, of course, we can’t forget that Mr. Jean was black. Neither can we
forget that this happened in America.
Several recent studies reveal that black Americans are 2.5 to 2.7 times more likely to be shot by police than are white people. The disparity becomes even more striking when we turn to the shooting of unarmed people.
People of color compose about 37% of the US population, yet they make up 62.7% of the unarmed victims shot by police.
Another study investigating police killings from 2014 to 2015 concluded that:
“The disproportionate killing of black men occurs…because of the institutional and organizational racism in police departments and the criminal justice system’s targeting minority communities with policies—like stop and frisk and the war on drugs—that have more destructive effects.”
Obviously, something has gone dangerously wrong in the way America’s police officers are being trained and the atmosphere in which they do their jobs.
All lives do not matter in America today. All lives are not equal here. Some lives count more than others. Mr. Jean’s death and the behavior of the Dallas police department is only the latest evidence.
Many who sneer at the Black Lives Matter movement are moral posers, pretending to a superior moral judgment by pasting “All Lives Matter” (the moral universalists) or “Blue Lives Matter” (the ethical particularists) bumper stickers on their cars. Tragically, such protests simply reveal how very, very deep are the wells of ignorance and incipient racism in white America.
To insist that “all lives matter” is to fain innocence while whispering behind a raised hand that “black lives don’t matter.”
Such reactionary slogans are rhetorically camouflaged “f**k you” bombs, equivalent to the old segregationist signs directing “Negroes to the Back of the Bus.”
Honestly, to insist that “all lives matter” in response to a movement led by African-Americans working to change a society where people who look like them are shot, killed, and arrested by police at wildly disproportionate rates is a stunning display of white privilege in and of itself.
It is a bold-faced lie to say that all lives matter in the United States.
That is why, as a Christian, an evangelical, a disciple of Jesus Christ, a citizen of God’s kingdom on earth, and the grandfather of a precious little black girl, I believe that every follower of Jesus must stand up and say, YES, BLACK LIVES MATTER.